Literature DB >> 7484275

Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates.

G E Fuleihan1, M A Testa, J E Angell, N Porrino, M S Leboff.   

Abstract

The enhanced precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allows the detection of very small changes in bone mineral density (BMD). True clinical changes in BMD in patients must be evaluated with the appropriate error of variance. We evaluated the responsiveness of our measures to true bone loss using a statistical variance components model that characterizes the variability associated with error introduced by the machine, operator, and subjects. Our techniques were applied to data from a prospective study of BMD measurements on spine phantoms and on pre- and postmenopausal women performed on the same day or up to 4 weeks apart with DXA (QDR 1000W, Hologic). Our model determined that most of the error in measurements was introduced by operators' and subjects' variability rather than machine performance. The false-positive rates for true bone change are significantly reduced when the appropriate CV% is used to estimate the significance of bone loss over time. Our study underscores the need to use the appropriate precision error to evaluate the clinical significance of changes in bone mass in individual subjects over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7484275     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  14 in total

1.  Baseline characteristics of participants in the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): Effects on Bone Structure and Architecture.

Authors:  Catherine M Donlon; Meryl S LeBoff; Sharon H Chou; Nancy R Cook; Trisha Copeland; Julie E Buring; Vadim Bubes; Gregory Kotler; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Factors affecting short-term precision of musculoskeletal measures using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).

Authors:  R R Swinford; S J Warden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effects of zoledronic acid on bone mineral density in premenopausal women receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies for HR+ breast cancer: the ProBONE II study.

Authors:  P Hadji; A Kauka; M Ziller; K Birkholz; M Baier; M Muth; M Bauer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Sex Differences in the Effects of Weight Loss Diets on Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition: POUNDS LOST Trial.

Authors:  Amir Tirosh; Russell J de Souza; Frank Sacks; George A Bray; Steven R Smith; Meryl S LeBoff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Reliability of lateral distal femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures.

Authors:  Nicole M Mueske; Linda S Chan; Tishya A L Wren
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  A El Maghraoui; A A Do Santos Zounon; I Jroundi; A Nouijai; M Ghazi; L Achemlal; A Bezza; M A Tazi; R Abouqual
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Effects of dietary nutrients and food groups on bone loss from the proximal femur in men and women in the 7th and 8th decades of age.

Authors:  S Kaptoge; A Welch; A McTaggart; A Mulligan; N Dalzell; N E Day; S Bingham; K-T Khaw; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Treatment failure in osteoporosis.

Authors:  A Diez-Perez; J D Adachi; D Agnusdei; J P Bilezikian; J E Compston; S R Cummings; R Eastell; E F Eriksen; J Gonzalez-Macias; U A Liberman; D A Wahl; E Seeman; J A Kanis; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.