Literature DB >> 7481930

Determinants of persistent compliance with screening for colorectal cancer.

A R Neilson1, D K Whynes.   

Abstract

Mass population screening for colorectal cancer is currently being evaluated by means of randomized controlled trials. These trials point to the likelihood that, if implemented, the level of both initial and sustained compliance will prevent the full potential of screening being realised. The paper opens by reviewing the evidence on determinants of compliance, both initial and longer term, although little empirical evidence on adherence to repeated screening is currently available. The paper then presents the results of a survey of persistent compliers and non-compliers within the English screening trial, in order to identify those characteristics most closely associated with persistent compliance behaviour. Persistent compliers are found, inter alia, to be of higher socio-economic classes than persistent non-compliers, to have more personal and family experiences of illness and to visit their dentists more regularly. The results suggest that generalized attempts at compliance enhancement would be ineffectual against the prevailing background characteristics of the non-compliant population, and that the more overt targeting of efforts in this respect is to be preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7481930     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00329-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  10 in total

1.  Testing a culturally appropriate, theory-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening among Native Hawaiians.

Authors:  Kathryn L Braun; Megan Fong; Momi E Kaanoi; Martina L Kamaka; Carolyn C Gotay
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Anand; N Anand; A Anand
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Colorectal cancer screening behavior and willingness: an outpatient survey in China.

Authors:  Shang-Xin Deng; Jie Gao; Wei An; Jie Yin; Quan-Cai Cai; Hua Yang; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Psychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Ian Zajac; Tess Gregory; Sarah Mehaffey; Naomi Roosa; Deborah Turnbull; Adrian Esterman; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

5.  Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention.

Authors:  C Beeker; J M Kraft; B G Southwell; C M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

6.  Barriers and facilitators of colon cancer screening among patients at faith-based neighborhood health centers.

Authors:  Melissa Tabbarah; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Mahlon Raymund; Ilene K Jewell; Richard K Zimmerman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2005-02

7.  Prostate cancer knowledge and screening attitudes of inner-city men.

Authors:  John Pendleton; Christopher Hopkins; Satoshi Anai; Kogenta Nakamura; Myron Chang; Anthony Grissett; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Factors influencing choices for colorectal cancer screening among previously unscreened African and Caucasian Americans: findings from a triangulation mixed methods investigation.

Authors:  Mack T Ruffin; John W Creswell; Masahito Jimbo; Michael D Fetters
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2009-04

9.  Body mass index and up-to-date colorectal cancer screening among Marylanders aged 50 years and older.

Authors:  Mikhail Menis; Bernard Kozlovsky; Pat Langenberg; Min Zhan; Diane M Dwyer; Ebenezer Israel; Carmela Groves; Annette Hopkins; Eileen K Steinberger
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Barriers to and facilitators of compliance with clinic-based cervical cancer screening: population-based cohort study of women aged 23-60 years.

Authors:  Ellinor Östensson; Susanna Alder; K Miriam Elfström; Karin Sundström; Niklas Zethraeus; Marc Arbyn; Sonia Andersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.