Literature DB >> 7480534

Conditioned reinforcing effects of capsules associated with high versus low monetary payoff.

C E Johanson1, A Mattox, C R Schuster.   

Abstract

The ability of a placebo drug capsule to serve as a conditioned reinforcer as a function of being paired with money reinforcement was evaluated. Volunteers were administered two differently colored capsules that presumably contained two different drugs. Although the volunteers were told they might contain a stimulant, sedative, or placebo, both capsules contained only a placebo. During sessions, volunteers participated in performance tasks. The tasks were programmed so that following one capsule, the amount of money obtained contingent upon responding was greater (high frequency of reinforcement) than following the other capsule (low frequency of reinforcement). During experiment 1, participants were exposed twice each to the two reinforcement conditions (sampling). During these choice sessions, 9 of 12 participants chose the capsule associated with the high frequency of reinforcement 2 or 3 times. Experiment 2 was designed to explore further whether the differential mood effects observed during sampling sessions could be conditioned. Although this could not be demonstrated, the self-administration results demonstrating the control of choice behavior even in the absence of pharmacological effects suggest that drugs may function as conditioned reinforcers. This finding has implications for broadening our understanding of the determinants of initiation and continued drug use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7480534     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  14 in total

1.  Enhancement of drug-seeking behavior by environmental stimuli associated with cocaine or morphine injections.

Authors:  S R Goldberg; R D Spealman; R T Kelleher
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Assessing individual differences in ethanol preference using a cumulative dosing procedure.

Authors:  H DeWit; J Pierri; C E Johanson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Relationship between the discriminative stimulus properties and subjective effects of drugs.

Authors:  C R Schuster; C E Johanson
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Ser       Date:  1988

Review 4.  Internal stimulus control and subjective effects of drugs.

Authors:  C R Schuster; M W Fischman; C E Johanson
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1981-07

5.  Reinforcing properties of lorazepam in normal volunteers.

Authors:  H de Wit; C E Johanson; E H Uhlenhuth
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Ethanol reinforcement in the alcohol nonpreferring rat: initiation using behavioral techniques without food restriction.

Authors:  H H Samson; G A Tolliver; L Lumeng; T K Li
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 7.  Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention.

Authors:  J D Hawkins; R F Catalano; J Y Miller
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Reinforcing and subjective effects of several anorectics in normal human volunteers.

Authors:  L D Chait; E H Uhlenhuth; C E Johanson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine.

Authors:  C E Johanson; E H Uhlenhuth
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Drug preference and mood in humans: diazepam.

Authors:  C E Johanson; E H Uhlenhuth
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  3 in total

1.  Paced smoking in the laboratory and in the natural smoking setting: differential situation-specific effects in light and heavy smokers.

Authors:  P E Schupp; R F Mucha; P Pauli
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Preference for gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in current users.

Authors:  John M Roll; Thomas Newton; Joy Chudzynski; Jennifer M Cameron; Sterling McPherson; Timothy Fong; Matt Torrington
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Prefrontal expectancy and reinforcement-driven antidepressant placebo effects.

Authors:  M Peciña; J Heffernan; J Wilson; J K Zubieta; A Y Dombrovski
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 6.222

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.