Literature DB >> 6734422

Reinforcing properties of lorazepam in normal volunteers.

H de Wit, C E Johanson, E H Uhlenhuth.   

Abstract

These experiments were designed to test the positive reinforcing property of a benzodiazepine in normal volunteer subjects. A choice procedure was used to measure preference for lorazepam, a benzodiazepine with a relatively short plasma half-life, over placebo. In separate experiments, subjects were given a choice between three doses of lorazepam (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg, p.o.) and placebo, and in a fourth experiment subjects were given a choice between lorazepam (1.0 mg) and a therapeutically equipotent dose of diazepam (5 mg). Subjective effects of the drugs were monitored using an experimental version of the Profile of Mood States and a shortened version of the Addiction Research Center Inventory. Subjects showed no preference for 0.5 mg lorazepam over placebo (49% drug choice) or for 1.0 mg lorazepam over diazepam (46% lorazepam choice). However, subjects preferred placebo to both 1.0 and 2.0 mg lorazepam (32% and 16% drug choice for 1.0 and 2.0 mg, respectively). Subjective effects were consistent with the drug's known sedative and anxiolytic properties. Relative to diazepam, lorazepam had a longer duration of effect than might be expected from its plasma half-life. Differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of the two drugs account for the results. The results showed that lorazepam is not an effective positive reinforcer in these subjects, suggesting that it also does not have high dependence potential in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6734422     DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(84)90030-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  10 in total

1.  Preference for diazepam, but not buspirone, in moderate drinkers.

Authors:  S M Evans; R R Griffiths; H de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A comparison of the acute behavioral effects of flunitrazepam and triazolam in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Farré; M T Terán; J Camí
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Drug preference in normal volunteers: effects of age and time of day.

Authors:  H de Wit; E H Uhlenhuth; C E Johanson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Conditioned reinforcing effects of capsules associated with high versus low monetary payoff.

Authors:  C E Johanson; A Mattox; C R Schuster
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Long-Term Use of Benzodiazepines: Implications and guidelines.

Authors:  N L Potts; K R Krishnan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Diazepam and triazolam self-administration in sedative abusers: concordance of subject ratings, performance and drug self-administration.

Authors:  J D Roache; R R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Drug deprivation and reinforcement by diazepam in a dependent population.

Authors:  H Cappell; U Busto; G Kay; C A Naranjo; E M Sellers; M Sanchez-Craig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Rebound insomnia and hypnotic self administration.

Authors:  T Roehrs; L Merlotti; F Zorick; T Roth
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  A therapeutic dose of zolpidem has limited abuse-like effects in drug-naïve females: a pilot study.

Authors:  Stephanie C Licata; David M Penetar; Steven Dunlap; Scott E Lukas
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 10.  Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of anorexia nervosa - too much for one drug?

Authors:  Guido K W Frank
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.