Literature DB >> 7478686

Gender differences in pain ratings and pupil reactions to painful pressure stimuli.

Wolfgang Ellermeier1, Wolfgang Westphal.   

Abstract

In order to investigate gender differences in pain perception, the present study employed both a psychophysical and a psychophysiological measure. In experiment 1, 20 subjects rated the painfulness of 4 different levels of tonic pressure applied to their fingers using a verbally anchored categorization procedure. In general agreement with studies of pain threshold and tolerance, female subjects reported greater pain at high levels of stimulation, with no gender difference being evident at low pressure levels. In experiment 2, 16 different subjects were exposed to the same painful pressure stimuli while measuring their pupil reactions using infrared video pupillometry. The pupil dilations seen during the last 10 sec of the 20-sec pressure application turned out to be a highly significant indicator of pain intensity. When female and male subjects were compared on this measure, a similar divergent pattern as in the psychophysical data emerged, with female subjects showing greater pupil dilations at high pressure levels only. The fact that gender differences in pain perception can be demonstrated using an autonomic indicator of pain that is beyond voluntary control suggests that these differences reflect low-level sensory and/or affective components of pain rather than attitudinal or response-bias factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7478686     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00203-Q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  37 in total

1.  Severe pain confounds neuropsychological test performance.

Authors:  E J Heyer; R Sharma; C J Winfree; J Mocco; D J McMahon; P A McCormick; D O Quest; J G McMurtry; C J Riedel; R M Lazar; Y Stern; E S Connolly
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  Pupil responses and pain ratings to heat stimuli: Reliability and effects of expectations and a conditioning pain stimulus.

Authors:  James C Eisenach; Regina Curry; Carol A Aschenbrenner; Robert C Coghill; Timothy T Houle
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  SEX AND RACE DIFFERENCES IN RATING OTHERS' PAIN, PAIN-RELATED NEGATIVE MOOD, PAIN COPING, AND RECOMMENDING MEDICAL HELP.

Authors:  Ashraf F Alqudah; Adam T Hirsh; Lauren A Stutts; Cindy D Scipio; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Cyber Ther Rehabil       Date:  2010

4.  Gender differences in pain perception and patterns of cerebral activation during noxious heat stimulation in humans.

Authors:  P E Paulson; S Minoshima; T J Morrow; K L Casey
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 5.  Gender differences affecting vocal health of women in vocally demanding careers.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Kristine Tanner; Marshall E Smith
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 1.487

6.  Sex differences in spatial accuracy relate to the neural activation of antagonistic muscles in young adults.

Authors:  Agostina Casamento-Moran; Sandra K Hunter; Yen-Ting Chen; Min Hyuk Kwon; Emily J Fox; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Monitoring the Brain After Cardiac Arrest: a New Era.

Authors:  Niraj Sinha; Sam Parnia
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Time to task failure varies with the gain of the feedback signal for women, but not for men.

Authors:  Carol J Mottram; Sandra K Hunter; Ludo Rochette; Melissa K Anderson; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Importance of sex to pain and its amelioration; relevance of spinal estrogens and its membrane receptors.

Authors:  Alan R Gintzler; Nai-Jiang Liu
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 8.606

10.  [Do men and women have different perceptions of pain?].

Authors:  F López de Castro; F J Rodríguez Alcalá; I Méndez Gallego; R Mancebo Pardo; R Gómez Calcerrada
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.