Niraj Sinha1, Sam Parnia2. 1. Resuscitation Research Group, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, T17-040 Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8172, USA. niraj.sinha@stonybrookmedicine.edu. 2. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, 462 First Avenue-OBV, 6th Floor, A621, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Of the approximately 350,000 out-of-hospital, and 750,000 after in-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) events in the US annually approximately 5-9% and 20% respectively may achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Up to 2/3 of these initial survivors may go on die in the subsequent 24-72 hours after ROSC due to a combination of (1) on-going cerebral injury, (2) myocardial dysfunction and (3) massive systemic inflammatory response. In order to successfully manage patients more effectively, monitoring methods are needed to aid clinicians in the detection and quantification of intra-cardiac arrest and post-resuscitation pathophysiological cerebral injury processes in the intensive care unit. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the last few years many modalities have been used for cerebral monitoring during and after CA, these include quantitative pupillometry, transcranial doppler sonography, optic nerve sheath diameter measurements, microdialysis, tissue oxygenation monitoring, intra-cranial pressure monitoring, and electroencephalography. Current studies indicate that these modalities may be used for the purpose of neurological monitoring during cardiac arrest resuscitation as well as in the post-resuscitation period. Multiple overlapping processes, including alterations in cerebral blood flow (CBF), raised intracerebralpressure, disorders of metabolism, imbalanced oxygen delivery and reperfusion injury contribute to cell death during the post-resuscitation period has led to the birth of post-resuscitation management strategies in the 21st century. This review provides a succinct overview of currently available bedside invasive and non-invasive neuro-monitoring methods after CA.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Of the approximately 350,000 out-of-hospital, and 750,000 after in-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) events in the US annually approximately 5-9% and 20% respectively may achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Up to 2/3 of these initial survivors may go on die in the subsequent 24-72 hours after ROSC due to a combination of (1) on-going cerebral injury, (2) myocardial dysfunction and (3) massive systemic inflammatory response. In order to successfully manage patients more effectively, monitoring methods are needed to aid clinicians in the detection and quantification of intra-cardiac arrest and post-resuscitation pathophysiological cerebral injury processes in the intensive care unit. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the last few years many modalities have been used for cerebral monitoring during and after CA, these include quantitative pupillometry, transcranial doppler sonography, optic nerve sheath diameter measurements, microdialysis, tissue oxygenation monitoring, intra-cranial pressure monitoring, and electroencephalography. Current studies indicate that these modalities may be used for the purpose of neurological monitoring during cardiac arrest resuscitation as well as in the post-resuscitation period. Multiple overlapping processes, including alterations in cerebral blood flow (CBF), raised intracerebralpressure, disorders of metabolism, imbalanced oxygen delivery and reperfusion injury contribute to cell death during the post-resuscitation period has led to the birth of post-resuscitation management strategies in the 21st century. This review provides a succinct overview of currently available bedside invasive and non-invasive neuro-monitoring methods after CA.
Authors: Robert W Neumar; Jerry P Nolan; Christophe Adrie; Mayuki Aibiki; Robert A Berg; Bernd W Böttiger; Clifton Callaway; Robert S B Clark; Romergryko G Geocadin; Edward C Jauch; Karl B Kern; Ivan Laurent; W T Longstreth; Raina M Merchant; Peter Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Vinay Nadkarni; Mary Ann Peberdy; Emanuel P Rivers; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; Frank W Sellke; Christian Spaulding; Kjetil Sunde; Terry Vanden Hoek Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-10-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Adithya Sivaraju; Emily J Gilmore; Charles R Wira; Anna Stevens; Nishi Rampal; Jeremy J Moeller; David M Greer; Lawrence J Hirsch; Nicolas Gaspard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Brian R White; Tiffany S Ko; Ryan W Morgan; Wesley B Baker; Emilie J Benson; Alec Lafontant; Jonathan P Starr; William P Landis; Kristen Andersen; Jharna Jahnavi; Jake Breimann; Nile Delso; Sarah Morton; Anna L Roberts; Yuxi Lin; Kathryn Graham; Robert A Berg; Arjun G Yodh; Daniel J Licht; Todd J Kilbaugh Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Simon Mölström; Troels Halfeld Nielsen; Carl H Nordström; Christian Hassager; Jacob Eifer Møller; Jesper Kjærgaard; Sören Möller; Henrik Schmidt; Palle Toft Journal: Trials Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Peggy L Nguyen; Laith Alreshaid; Roy A Poblete; Geoffrey Konye; Jonathan Marehbian; Gene Sung Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 4.003