Literature DB >> 7476087

A computer simulation of the static magnetic field distribution in the human head.

S Li1, G D Williams, T A Frisk, B W Arnold, M B Smith.   

Abstract

Distortion of the static magnetic field inside the human head is dependent on regional tissue susceptibility variations and geometrical shape. These effects result in resonance line broadening and frequency shifts and consequently, intensity and spatial errors in both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy. To calculate the field distortion due to the susceptibility's geometry, two dimensional (2D) finite element analysis was applied to simulate the field distribution in a 2D model of the human head, placed in a uniform magnetic field. The model contains air-filled cavities and sinuses, and the remainder is treated as water. The magnetic field deviation was evaluated using gray scale plots and histograms of the magnetic field. The shifts in parts/million and broadening of the histograms correspond to the NMR of the sampled region. The field distribution of the human head was also experimentally mapped using the DANTE tagging sequence. The calculated and experimental field maps are in good agreement. Thus, geometric considerations with uniform susceptibilities are sufficient to explain most of the static magnetic field distribution in the human head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7476087     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910340219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  11 in total

1.  Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison.

Authors:  O Gonen; S Gruber; B S Li; V Mlynárik; E Moser
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  13C MRS of occipital and frontal lobes at 3 T using a volume coil for stochastic proton decoupling.

Authors:  Shizhe Li; Yan Zhang; Shumin Wang; Maria Ferraris Araneta; Christopher S Johnson; Yun Xiang; Robert B Innis; Jun Shen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  K-space spatial low-pass filters can increase signal loss artifacts in Echo-Planar Imaging.

Authors:  E C Caparelli; D Tomasi
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.880

4.  Multiple-echo proton spectroscopic imaging using time domain parametric spectral analysis.

Authors:  A P Kiefer; V Govindaraju; G B Matson; M W Weiner; A A Maudsley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  "Willed action": a functional MRI study of the human prefrontal cortex during a sensorimotor task.

Authors:  F Hyder; E A Phelps; C J Wiggins; K S Labar; A M Blamire; R G Shulman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Physical limits to human brain B0 shimming with spherical harmonics, engineering implications thereof.

Authors:  Bruno Pinho Meneses; Alexis Amadon
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.533

7.  Computational modeling of magnetic nanoparticle targeting to stent surface under high gradient field.

Authors:  Shunqiang Wang; Yihua Zhou; Jifu Tan; Jiang Xu; Jie Yang; Yaling Liu
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Global brain metabolic quantification with whole-head proton MRS at 3 T.

Authors:  Ivan I Kirov; William E Wu; Brian J Soher; Matthew S Davitz; Jeffrey H Huang; James S Babb; Mariana Lazar; Girish Fatterpekar; Oded Gonen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 9.  Motion correction in magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Muhammad G Saleh; Richard A E Edden; Linda Chang; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.737

10.  Template-based field map prediction for rapid whole brain B0 shimming.

Authors:  Yuhang Shi; S Johanna Vannesjo; Karla L Miller; Stuart Clare
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.