P Flamen1, A Bossuyt, P R Franken. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Tetrofosmin is a new 99mTc-labeled myocardial perfusion imaging agent. Biodistribution studies suggest more favorable heart-to-adjacent organ biokinetics than for 99mTc-sestamibi after injection during exercise. The aim of this work was to determine intraindividually whether tetrofosmin is more suitable than sestamibi for pharmacological stress testing in a 1-day protocol. METHODS:Thirty subjects underwent two similar 1-day, rest and dipyridamole stress imaging protocols: one using tetrofosmin, the other using sestamibi. SPECT was performed 60 min after tracer administration. Myocardial images were analyzed both visually and quantitatively. RESULTS:Heart-to-liver activity ratios measured on the anterior SPECT projections were significantly higher for tetrofosmin than for sestamibi in the rest and stress studies. Heart-to-lung ratios were similar for both tracers. Significant linear correlations between tetrofosmin and sestamibi perfusion indices were found in normals and in patients with proven or suspected coronary artery disease. In segments showing abnormal uptake during stress, the perfusion indices were similar for tetrofosmin and sestamibi at rest and during stress. The degree of reversibility in these segments was also similar for both tracers. Finally, the extent, intensity and severity of perfusion defects were similar for both tracer studies. CONCLUSION:Tetrofosmin has a more optimal biodistribution than sestamibi when used in a 1-day, rest and dipyridamole stress myocardial SPECT imaging protocol. No significant difference in either the quality or diagnostic interpretation of the images could be demonstrated.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: Tetrofosmin is a new 99mTc-labeled myocardial perfusion imaging agent. Biodistribution studies suggest more favorable heart-to-adjacent organ biokinetics than for 99mTc-sestamibi after injection during exercise. The aim of this work was to determine intraindividually whether tetrofosmin is more suitable than sestamibi for pharmacological stress testing in a 1-day protocol. METHODS: Thirty subjects underwent two similar 1-day, rest and dipyridamole stress imaging protocols: one using tetrofosmin, the other using sestamibi. SPECT was performed 60 min after tracer administration. Myocardial images were analyzed both visually and quantitatively. RESULTS: Heart-to-liver activity ratios measured on the anterior SPECT projections were significantly higher for tetrofosmin than for sestamibi in the rest and stress studies. Heart-to-lung ratios were similar for both tracers. Significant linear correlations between tetrofosmin and sestamibi perfusion indices were found in normals and in patients with proven or suspected coronary artery disease. In segments showing abnormal uptake during stress, the perfusion indices were similar for tetrofosmin and sestamibi at rest and during stress. The degree of reversibility in these segments was also similar for both tracers. Finally, the extent, intensity and severity of perfusion defects were similar for both tracer studies. CONCLUSION:Tetrofosmin has a more optimal biodistribution than sestamibi when used in a 1-day, rest and dipyridamole stress myocardial SPECT imaging protocol. No significant difference in either the quality or diagnostic interpretation of the images could be demonstrated.
Authors: Reginald G E J Groutars; J Fred Verzijlbergen; Monique M C Tiel-van Buul; Aeilco H Zwinderman; Carl A P L Ascoop; Norbert M van Hemel; Ernst E van der Wall Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Grant T Gullberg; Bryan W Reutter; Arkadiusz Sitek; Jonathan S Maltz; Thomas F Budinger Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Min Young Lee; Sang Hun Lee; Jae Hong Park; Jung Sun Heo; Yu Jin Lee; Han Na Suh; Jung Jun Min; Young Soon Seo; Ho Jae Han Journal: J Vet Sci Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 1.672
Authors: Wanda Acampa; Alberto Cuocolo; Mario Petretta; Andrea Bruno; Massimo Castellani; Andrea Finzi; Paolo Gerundini Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952