Literature DB >> 7472499

Attention and target selection for smooth pursuit eye movements.

V P Ferrera1, S G Lisberger.   

Abstract

Two rhesus monkeys were trained to track a small moving target in the presence of a moving distractor. The target and distractor were distinguished by their color. Smooth pursuit eye movements were quantified in terms of the latency of the eye movement and the open-loop eye acceleration profile. Smooth pursuit latencies for single targets were on the order of 100 msec. When the target was paired with a distractor moving in the same direction as the target, pursuit latencies decreased to roughly 85 msec. When the target was paired with a distractor moving in the opposite direction, pursuit latencies increased to roughly 150 msec. The motion of the distractor had no significant effect on the eye acceleration profile. Experiments were performed to dissociate visual search for the target from pursuit initiation by providing a spatial cue rather than the color cue. These experiments showed that visual search necessarily preceded pursuit initiation only when the distractor moved in the opposite direction relative to the target. In this case, visual search contributed about 25 msec to the overall latency of pursuit. Control experiments showed that the monkey need not attend to the distractor in order for it to influence the latency of pursuit. A network model was developed in which units that represent the motions of the target and distractor compete against one another. Attention serves to bias the outcome of this competition toward the direction of the selected target. The performance of this network exhibits a striking parallel to the effect of the distractor on smooth pursuit latency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7472499      PMCID: PMC6578095     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Integration time for the perception of depth from motion parallax.

Authors:  Mark Nawrot; Keith Stroyan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Shared response preparation for pursuit and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Dorion Liston; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Target selection for predictive smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  E Poliakoff; C J S Collins; G R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial mapping of the remote distractor effect on smooth pursuit initiation.

Authors:  Paul C Knox; Tarik Bekkour
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Similar effects of feature-based attention on motion perception and pursuit eye movements at different levels of awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The importance of decision onset.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Jack Grinband; Vincent Ferrera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The effects of dividing attention on smooth pursuit eye tracking.

Authors:  S B Hutton; D Tegally
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neural activity in the frontal pursuit area does not underlie pursuit target selection.

Authors:  Shaun Mahaffy; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.