Literature DB >> 7468167

Tensile fracture of cancellous bone.

D R Carter, G H Schwab, D M Spengler.   

Abstract

Excised specimens of cancellous bone from human femora were subjected to compressive or tensile testing, and the resulting force-displacement curves were recorded. The relationships between bone strength and apparent density were similar for specimens tested in these two loading modes. The modulus of elasticity was also comparable for the tensile and compressive specimens. Specimens loaded in compression absorbed considerable energy after the initial fracture because of progressive impaction of the trabeculae. In the specimens loaded in tension, the fractured bone fragments separated and therefore absorbed little additional energy after the initial failure. The energy absorption capacity was thus significantly lower for the tensile specimens. The results of this study show that the primary difference in mechanical properties of cancellous bone tested in tension and compression is the energy absorption capacity. This finding suggests that tensile and avulsion fractures of cancellous bone observed clinically are associated with minimal energy absorption and therefore may be precipitated by relatively minor trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7468167     DOI: 10.3109/17453678008990868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  7 in total

1.  Fatigue characterization of a polymer foam to use as a cancellous bone analog material in the assessment of orthopaedic devices.

Authors:  V Palissery; M Taylor; M Browne
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Recent advances and future perspectives of sol-gel derived porous bioactive glasses: a review.

Authors:  Kalim Deshmukh; Tomáš Kovářík; Tomáš Křenek; Denitsa Docheva; Theresia Stich; Josef Pola
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 4.  Bone mechanical properties and changes with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Georg Osterhoff; Elise F Morgan; Sandra J Shefelbine; Lamya Karim; Laoise M McNamara; Peter Augat
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone.

Authors:  S Zhao; M Arnold; S Ma; R L Abel; J P Cobb; U Hansen; O Boughton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Elastography of the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Yoann Hériveaux; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Didier Geiger; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The biomechanical evaluation of magnetic forces to drive osteogenesis in newborn's with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Prasad Nalabothu; Carlalberta Verna; Markus Steineck; Andreas Albert Mueller; Michel Dalstra
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.