Literature DB >> 7463444

Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance.

J A Buckwalter, R Schumacher, J P Albright, R R Cooper.   

Abstract

Complex cognitive processes, such as interpretation of information and problem-solving, form a critical part of medical practice; therefore, the aims of many educational programs include teaching these processes. However, systematic evaluation of students' interpretation of information or problem-solving may be difficult. To determine whether objective test items could measure cognitive processes more complex than recall of isolated facts, the committee of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons preparing the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination classified test items into three taxonomic levels according to the cognitive process required to answer the item: recall or recognition, interpretation, and problem-solving. Orthopedic residents from 20 universities took the examination and classified items according to the cognitive process they believed they used to answer the questions. Two methods of analysis showed that residents agreed closely with the taxonomic levels assigned by the committee, suggesting that items did test the cognitive process they were designed to measure and that objective assessment of complex cognitive processes is practical and potentially very useful in medical education.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7463444     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198102000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Educ        ISSN: 0022-2577


  13 in total

1.  Levels of Evidence for Hand Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination.

Authors:  Louis C Grandizio; James C Huston; Stephanie S Shim; Jove Graham; Joel C Klena
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-22

2.  Striving to change.

Authors:  W G Irwin
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1982

3.  Analysis of the Korean Orthopedic In-Training Examination: The Hip and Pelvis Section.

Authors:  Yohan Cho; Joon Yub Kim; Jai Hyung Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-09-30

4.  Analysis of Hand Surgery Questions on Orthopedic In-training Examination From 2014 to 2019.

Authors:  Drake G LeBrun; Ajay Premkumar; Bridget Ellsworth; Tony S Shen; Michael B Cross; Duretti T Fufa
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-10-26

5.  Analysis of the pathology section of the OITE will aid in trainee preparation.

Authors:  Frank J Frassica; Derek Papp; Edward McCarthy; Kristy Weber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Evaluation of Multiple Choice and Short Essay Question items in Basic Medical Sciences.

Authors:  Mukhtiar Baig; Syeda Kauser Ali; Sobia Ali; Nighat Huda
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  An assessment of the Chilean National Examination of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Mario Orrego; Ana C Wright; Diego Amenabar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Evaluation of Cognitive levels and Item writing flaws in Medical Pharmacology Internal Assessment Examinations.

Authors:  Saba Tariq; Sundus Tariq; Sadia Maqsood; Shireen Jawed; Mukhtiar Baig
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Evaluating the Quality of Multiple Choice Question in Paediatric Dentistry Postgraduate Examinations.

Authors:  Mawlood Kowash; Iyad Hussein; Manal Al Halabi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2019-09-08

10.  Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.

Authors:  Edward J Palmer; Peter G Devitt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.