Literature DB >> 18425562

Analysis of the pathology section of the OITE will aid in trainee preparation.

Frank J Frassica1, Derek Papp, Edward McCarthy, Kristy Weber.   

Abstract

We analyzed the tumor-related questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examinations (OITE) over a 5-year period (2002-2006). Each year approximately 27 of the 275 examination questions (10%) are tumor-related. Malignant conditions are tested more than benign ones (1.2:1). Approximately nine questions per year are immediate recall of specific entities, while eight questions tested the examinees' ability to establish a diagnosis from imaging studies with or without biopsy material. Participants were required to establish a diagnosis from imaging studies and/or biopsy material and then choose treatment an average of seven times per examination. The examinees' abilities in evaluation and decision making of patients was only tested an average of twice during each examination. Analysis of the content and type of question on the OITE might enable trainees to prepare more systematically. We determined the content, classified the questions, and quantified the interpretive material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18425562      PMCID: PMC2384018          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0235-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Correlating selection criteria with subsequent performance as residents.

Authors:  Douglas R Dirschl; Laurence E Dahners; George L Adams; John H Crouch; Frank C Wilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Relation of residency selection factors to subsequent orthopaedic in-training examination performance.

Authors:  Kelly D Carmichael; James B Westmoreland; John A Thomas; Rita M Patterson
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  Resident selection and predictors of performance: can we be evidence based?

Authors:  Douglas R Dirschl; Edmund R Campion; Karen Gilliam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Prediction of ABOG written examination performance from the third-year CREOG in-training examination results.

Authors:  William N Spellacy; Steven J Carlan; Joan M McCarthy; John C M Tsibris
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.142

5.  Predicting pass rates on the American Board of Internal Medicine certifying examination.

Authors:  L K Rollins; J R Martindale; M Edmond; T Manser; W M Scheld
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  1998 Joseph E. Whitley, MD, Award. Relationship between American College of Radiology in-training examination scores and American Board of Radiology written examination scores. Part 2. Multi-institutional study.

Authors:  B R Baumgartner; S B Peterman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance.

Authors:  J A Buckwalter; R Schumacher; J P Albright; R R Cooper
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1981-02

8.  Observations on the American Board of Surgery In-Training examination, board results, and conference attendance.

Authors:  P L Shetler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  A comparison of performance on the OMSITE and ABOMS written qualifying examination. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery In-Training Examination. American Board of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  E Ellis; R H Haug
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  The hazards of the biopsy, revisited. Members of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society.

Authors:  H J Mankin; C J Mankin; M A Simon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Orthopedic Oncology Caseload Among Orthopedic Surgery Residents.

Authors:  Richard M Hinds; Timothy B Rapp; John T Capo
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Analysis of the Korean Orthopedic In-Training Examination: The Hip and Pelvis Section.

Authors:  Yohan Cho; Joon Yub Kim; Jai Hyung Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-09-30

3.  Analysis of Hand Surgery Questions on Orthopedic In-training Examination From 2014 to 2019.

Authors:  Drake G LeBrun; Ajay Premkumar; Bridget Ellsworth; Tony S Shen; Michael B Cross; Duretti T Fufa
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-10-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.