Literature DB >> 7462687

Antibiotic prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

G L Archer, G J Vazquez, J L Johnston.   

Abstract

Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) was evaluated in a modified rabbit endocarditis model and compared with results obtained with methicillin-sensitive S. epidermidis (MSSE). One dose of nafcillin, cefamandole, cephalothin, or vancomycin neither prevented endocarditis nor sterilized the blood of rabbits challenged with each of two MRSE or two MSSE isolates. One dose of gentamicin protected greater than or equal to 80% of animals challenged with three of the four isolates, and one dose of rifampin protected greater than or equal to 90% challenged with any of the four isolates. Multiple doses of any of the antibiotics prevented endocarditis in greater than or equal to 80% of rabbits challenged with MSSE, and four doses of vancomycin protected rabbits challenged with MRSE. However, MRSE endocarditis was prevented in less than or equal to 25% of animals given six doses of nafcillin or cephalosporins. Thus, nafcillin and cephalosporins were ineffective prophylaxis for MRSE endocarditis, whereas vancomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin were effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7462687     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/142.5.725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  15 in total

1.  Species distribution and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Coagulase-negative Staphylococci at a tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Puneet Bhatt; Kundan Tandel; Alina Singh; M Mugunthan; Naveen Grover; A K Sahni
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-03-29

2.  Rationale for eliminating Staphylococcus breakpoints for β-lactam agents other than penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien Bard; Janet A Hindler; Howard S Gold; Brandi Limbago
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Bacterial persistence and expression of disease.

Authors:  G J Domingue; H B Woody
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci: detection methods and treatment of infections.

Authors:  C J Hackbarth; H F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis of experimental endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  L M Baddour; M M Hill; A M Felty-Duckworth
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Salt-supplemented medium for testing methicillin-resistant staphylococci with newer beta-lactams.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J S Redding; L A Maher; P E Ramirez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Rifampin blood and tissue levels in patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.

Authors:  G L Archer; B C Armstrong; B J Kline
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  S B Price; D J Flournoy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Bacterial concentration correlations in experimental endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  L M Baddour; G D Christensen; A L Bisno
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.