Literature DB >> 7459427

Bioavailability of atenolol formulations.

J Mcainsh, W T Simpson, B F Holmes, J Young, S H Ellis.   

Abstract

In this comparative bioavailability study two tablet formulations of atenolol (sales and clinical trial) were compared with an oral solution. Twelve healthy adult male volunteers received, on a cross-over basis, on three separate occasions, 100 mg oral dose of the three formulations of atenolol. Bioavailability was based on concentrations of atenolol in whole blood and urine. The atenolol blood levels peaked at approximately 3 h after dosing, with individual values ranging from 0.21 to 0.92 microgram ml-1 (a four-fold difference), with all three formulations. Three-fold variations among subjects occurred in the areas under the curve (AUC) and urinary recoveries. The average elimination of half-life of atenolol was between 6 and 7 h for all three formulations. Some statistically significant differences were observed between the tablets and the aqueous solution: the AUC (infinity) and mean peak blood concentrations were significantly greater with the U.K. sales tablet than the solution, and the mean concentrations in the blood at certain specified times after administration were significantly greater with the two tablet formulations than the solution. The profiles of absorption and excretion of the two tablet formulations were similar. No adverse reactions were encountered in this study and all subjects completed the study without incidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7459427     DOI: 10.1002/bdd.2510010604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos        ISSN: 0142-2782            Impact factor:   1.627


  6 in total

1.  The effect of infinitesimal drug dilutions on the pharmacokinetics of nalidixic acid and atenolol.

Authors:  N Ferry; N Bernard; N Pozet; E Gardes; M Bruguier; G Cuisinaud; J Sassard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Variability of beta-blocker pharmacokinetics in young volunteers.

Authors:  D B Jack; C P Quarterman; R Zaman; M J Kendall
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Computer-assisted design for atenolol prodrugs for the use in aqueous formulations.

Authors:  Rafik Karaman; Khuloud Dajani; Hussein Hallak
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between nifedipine and the beta-adrenoceptor blockers metoprolol and atenolol.

Authors:  M J Kendall; D B Jack; S J Laugher; J Lobo; S Rolf Smith
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The effect of cimetidine on the relative cardioselectivity of atenolol and metoprolol in asthmatic patients.

Authors:  M E Ellis; M Hussain; A K Webb; N P Barker; T J Fitzsimons
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Design, synthesis, and in vitro kinetics study of atenolol prodrugs for the use in aqueous formulations.

Authors:  Rafik Karaman; Alaa Qtait; Khulod Khayyat Dajani; Saleh Abu Lafi
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.