Literature DB >> 7457698

Gastric pH monitoring as a prognostic indicator for the prophylaxis of stress ulceration in the critically III.

J C Stothert, E P Dellinger, D A Simonowitz, J A Schilling.   

Abstract

Previous studies have documented the efficacy of prophylaxis in the prevention of stress ulceration and bleeding in critically ill patients. In an effort to determine whether all critically ill patients require prophylaxis, 144 patients admitted to an intensive care unit were monitored by continuous indwelling nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes. Any patient with a measured gastric pH of less than 4 was treated with prophylactic cimetidine or antacids to maintain a pH of 4 or greater. One hundred twenty-three (85 percent) met this criterion. The gastric pH of 21 patients (15 percent) never fell below 4 during continuous monitoring for 26+/- 4.2 hours. There was a significantly lower incidence of hypotension and respiratory failure in this group ( pl < 0.05). Mortality was higher in the patients who required prophylaxis (15 percent) than in those who did not (0 percent). No bleeding was encountered in any patient in either group. These data suggest that patients who do not require prophylaxis may be determined by continuous monitoring of intragastric pH. If, within 24 hours, intragastric pH does not fall below 4, minimal indications for prophylaxis exist. Intragastric pH monitoring is a simple, effective tool in the care and management of critically ill or traumatized patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7457698     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90112-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Early effects of oral administration of omeprazole and roxatidine on intragastric pH.

Authors:  Hiroshi Iida; Shingo Kato; Yusuke Sekino; Eiji Sakai; Takashi Uchiyama; Hiroki Endo; Kunihiro Hosono; Yasunari Sakamoto; Koji Fujita; Masato Yoneda; Tomoko Koide; Hirokazu Takahashi; Chikako Tokoro; Ayumu Goto; Yasunobu Abe; Noritoshi Kobayashi; Kensuke Kubota; Eiji Gotoh; Shin Maeda; Atsushi Nakajima; Masahiko Inamori
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Effect of intravenous omeprazole on intragastric pH during intravenous infusion of amino acids.

Authors:  L C Baak; J B Jansen; C B Lamers
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Intragastric pH measurement using a novel disposable sensor.

Authors:  M J Heath; J D Owen; S W Sanders; K G Tolman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Antacids revisited: a review of their clinical pharmacology and recommended therapeutic use.

Authors:  P N Maton; M E Burton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  pH-dependent bactericidal barrier to gram-negative aerobes: its relevance to airway colonisation and prophylaxis of acid aspiration and stress ulcer syndromes--study in vitro.

Authors:  S Mehta; J F Archer; J Mills
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Continuous intragastric pH measurement in the critically ill and treatment with parenteral ranitidine.

Authors:  M Albin; J Friedlos; K Hillman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  pH-control via secretin or antacid: prophylaxia of stress ulcers in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  L Lehmann; W Duesel; P Klaue; H Pfeiffer; I Rietbrock
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 17.440

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.