Literature DB >> 7451782

Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: influence of nebulizer output, particle size, and method of inhalation.

G Ryan, M B Dolovich, G Obminski, D W Cockcroft, E Juniper, F E Hargreave, M T Newhouse.   

Abstract

Standardization of inhalation tests requires a knowledge of factors that will affect the response. We measured the output and particle size of six types of nebulizers used for inhalation tests. Output varied considerably between nebulizers of different types (0.12 to 1.59 ml/min) and to a lesser extent between nebulizers of the same type. Particle size varied between 0.8 and 5.2 micrometer aerodynamic mass median diameter (AMMD). The influence of these two properties on bronchial response to inhaled methacholine was examined. Nebulizer output but not particle size (between 1.3 and 3.6 micrometer AMMD) altered the response. We also examined the effect of change in inspiratory time during inhalation from residual volume to total lung capacity on lung deposition of radiolabeled aerosol and on the provocative concentration of histamine required to reduce the 1-sec forced expiratory volume (FEV1) by 20% (PC20). A reduction in inspiratory time from 8 to 2 sec resulted in a lower total lung dose, relatively more aerosol deposited in central airways, and a higher PC20. The results emphasize the importance of keeping nebulizer output and pattern of breathing constant when performing inhalation provocation tests if consistent results are to be obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7451782     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90012-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  29 in total

1.  Jet and ultrasonic nebuliser output: use of a new method for direct measurement of aerosol output.

Authors:  J H Dennis; S C Stenton; J R Beach; A J Avery; E H Walters; D J Hendrick
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Effect of oral mexiletine on the cough response to capsaicin and tartaric acid.

Authors:  M Fujimura; Y Kamio; S Myou; T Hashimoto
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  In vitro and in vivo aspects of cascade impactor tests and inhaler performance: a review.

Authors:  Jolyon Mitchell; Steve Newman; Hak-Kim Chan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  Bronchial provocation tests with pharmacological agents.

Authors:  C B Robinson; G H Parsons
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1990 Summer-Fall

Review 5.  Specific bronchoprovocation testing.

Authors:  M Chan-Yeung; M Kinsella; D N Ostrow
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1990 Summer-Fall

Review 6.  Nebuliser therapy in childhood.

Authors:  P W Barry; C O'Callaghan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Effect of breathing pattern during inhalation challenge on the shape and position of the dose-response curve.

Authors:  S Guillemi; A L James; P D Pare
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.584

8.  Hard metal asthma: cross immunological and respiratory reactivity between cobalt and nickel?

Authors:  T Shirakawa; Y Kusaka; N Fujimura; M Kato; S Heki; K Morimoto
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  A radiometric study of factors affecting drug output of jet nebulizers.

Authors:  G Mittal; N Kumar; H Rawat; M K Chopra; A Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.975

10.  Histamine dose-response curves in asthma: reproducibility and sensitivity of different indices to assess response.

Authors:  P Dehaut; A Rachiele; R R Martin; J L Malo
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.