Literature DB >> 2247862

Jet and ultrasonic nebuliser output: use of a new method for direct measurement of aerosol output.

J H Dennis1, S C Stenton, J R Beach, A J Avery, E H Walters, D J Hendrick.   

Abstract

Output from jet nebulisers is calibrated traditionally by weighing them before and after nebulisation, but the assumption that the weight difference is a close measure of aerosol generation could be invalidated by the concomitant process of evaporation. A method has been developed for measuring aerosol output directly by using a solute (fluoride) tracer and aerosol impaction, and this has been compared with the traditional weight loss method for two Wright, six Turbo, and four Micro-Cirrus jet nebulisers and two Microinhaler ultrasonic nebulisers. The weight loss method overestimated true aerosol output for all jet nebulisers. The mean aerosol content, expressed as a percentage of the total weight loss, varied from as little as 15% for the Wright jet nebulisers to 54% (range 45-61%) for the Turbo and Micro-Cirrus jet nebulisers under the operating conditions used. In contrast, there was no discrepancy between weight loss and aerosol output for the ultrasonic nebulisers. These findings, along with evidence of both concentrating and cooling effects from jet nebulisation, confirm that total output from jet nebulisers contains two distinct fractions, vapour and aerosol. The vapour fraction, but not the aerosol fraction, was greatly influenced by reservoir temperature within the nebuliser; so the ratio of aerosol output to total weight loss varied considerably with temperature. It is concluded that weight loss is an inappropriate method of calibrating jet nebuliser aerosol output, and that this should be measured directly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2247862      PMCID: PMC462714          DOI: 10.1136/thx.45.10.728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  21 in total

1.  Relationship between deposition of and responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in normal and asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  E Donna; I Danta; C S Kim; A Wanner
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Inaccurate calculation of drug output from nebulisers.

Authors:  C O'Callaghan; A R Clarke; A D Milner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Room temperature influences output from the Wright jet nebulizer.

Authors:  J Kongerud; V Søyseth; B Johansen
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Evaluation of nebulisers for bronchial challenge tests.

Authors:  J N Tsanakas; A J Wilson; A W Boon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Aerosol deposition in automatic dosimeter nebulization.

Authors:  M M Nieminen; H Holli; A Lahdensuo; A Muittari; J Karvonen
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis       Date:  1987-09

6.  Effect of solution flow rate on the output of two modified commercially available jet nebulizers.

Authors:  A J Hickey; P R Byron
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  In vitro comparison of DeVilbiss jet and ultrasonic nebulizers.

Authors:  S P Newman; P G Pellow; S W Clarke
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; T S Hurst; B P Gore
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Wastage of drug from nebulisers: a review.

Authors:  M M Clay; S W Clarke
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 10.  Generation and characterization of aerosols and vapors for inhalation experiments.

Authors:  M I Tillery; G O Wood; H J Ettinger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Methodology of bronchial responsiveness.

Authors:  S Chinn
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Selecting and using nebuliser equipment.

Authors:  A H Kendrick; E C Smith; R S Wilson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  The science of nebulised drug delivery.

Authors:  C O'Callaghan; P W Barry
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Overview of nebuliser treatment.

Authors:  M F Muers
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Differences in aerosol output and airways responsiveness between the DeVilbiss 40 and 45 hand held nebulisers.

Authors:  C J Hartley-Sharpe; H Booth; D P Johns; E H Walters
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Measurement of airway responsiveness to methacholine: relative importance of the precision of drug delivery and the method of assessing response.

Authors:  J R Beach; C L Young; A J Avery; S C Stenton; J H Dennis; E H Walters; D J Hendrick
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Nebuliser performance, pharmacokinetics, airways and systemic effects of salbutamol given via a novel nebuliser delivery system ("Ventstream").

Authors:  D M Newnham; B J Lipworth
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Asthma trends. Different nebulizers may explain Australian findings.

Authors:  H Booth; C Hartley-Sharpe; H Walters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-03

9.  A modified nebulization modality versus classical ultrasonic nebulization and oxygen-driven nebulization in facilitating airway clearance in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qiaoling Luo; Zeguang Zheng; Huihong Cen; Mei Jiang; Qin Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  A radiometric study of factors affecting drug output of jet nebulizers.

Authors:  G Mittal; N Kumar; H Rawat; M K Chopra; A Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.975

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.