Literature DB >> 7449647

[Semi-automatic measurement of blood pressure--how reliable is it? (author's transl)].

R A Steiner, T F Lüscher, W Siegenthaler, W Vetter.   

Abstract

Six commercially available semiautomatic blood-pressure measuring devices were tested on 50 patients each for their accuracy, freedom from recording artefact and ease of use. Only one on average showed no significant deviation from the reference measuring system (Hawksley Random Zero Mercury Manometer), but individual values showed considerable scatter around those obtained with the reference manometer. All other semi-automatic apparatus had systematic errors, of both systolic and diastolic values. Degree of recording interference was acceptable for all six apparatus and ease of use satisfactory. These results indicate that none of the tested apparatus offers any advantage over conventional blood-pressure measuring devices in respect of accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7449647     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1070962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  2 in total

1.  Single cuff comparison of two methods for indirect measurement of arterial blood pressure: standard auscultatory method versus automatic oscillometric method.

Authors:  H Pessenhofer
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 17.165

2.  [Patient compliance (author's transl)].

Authors:  T Lüscher; H Vetter; P Greminger; R Steiner; W Siegenthaler; W Vetter
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1982-02-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.