Literature DB >> 7443210

Comparative evaluation of the Autofield-I, CFA-120, and Fieldmaster Model 101-PR automated perimeters.

C A Johnson, J L Keltner.   

Abstract

Clinical evaluations of the Autofield-I, CFA-120, and Fieldmaster Model 101-PR automated perimeters were performed in comparison with manual kinetic testing on the Goldmann perimeter. All the automated perimeters displayed similar high rates of detecting visual field defects, although their false-alarm (false-positive) rates were considerably different. The principal factors responsible for high-detection and low false-alarm rates are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1980        PMID： 7443210     DOI： 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35162-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN： 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  8 in total

1.  Levobunolol compared with timolol: a four-year study.

Authors:  O Geyer; M Lazar; G D Novack; D Shen; C Y Eto
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Analytic approaches to the interpretation of automated threshold perimetric data for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.

Authors:  A Sommer; C Duggan; C Auer; H Abbey
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1985

3.  Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma.

Authors:  C Hong; Y Kitazawa; S Shirato
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  The specificity of the automated suprathreshold perimeter Fieldmaster 200.

Authors:  E Gramer; B Steinhauser; G K Krieglstein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The fieldmaster 101 PR automatic visual field screener--technical evaluation and clinical results.

Authors:  R W de Boer; T J van den Berg; E L Greve; H J Bos
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Performance of computer assisted perimeters.

Authors:  E L Greve
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The Ocuplot semi-automatic visual field screener--technical evaluation and clinical results.

Authors:  R W de Boer; T J van den Berg; E L Greve; L J de Heer; P Wiercx
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Evaluation of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyser Mark II. Part 2. Results from a population with induced visual field defects.

Authors:  D B Henson; S M Dix
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.638
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.