Literature DB >> 7441763

Morphology of the gastrointestinal tract in primates: comparisons with other mammals in relation to diet.

D J Chivers, C M Hladik.   

Abstract

Three categories of dietary adaptation are recognized--faunivory, frugivory, and folivory--according to the distinctive structural and biochemical features of animal matter, fruit, and leaves respectively, and the predominance of only one in the diets of most species. Mammals subsisting mainly on animal matter have a simple stomach and colon and a long small intestine, whereas folivorous species have a complex stomach and/or an enlarged caecum and colon; mammals eating mostly fruit have an intermediate morphology, according to the nature of the fruit and their tendency to supplement this diet with either animal matter or leaves. The frugivorous group are mostly primates: 50 of the 78 mammalian species, and 117 of the 180 individuals included in this analysis are primates. Coefficients of gut differentiation, the ratio of stomach and large intestine to small intestine (by area, weight, and volume), are low in faunivores and high in folivores; the continuous spread of coefficients reflects the different degrees of adaptation to these two dietary extremes. Interspecific comparisons are developed by allowing for allometric factors. In faunivores, in which fermentation is minimal, the volume of stomach and large intestine is related to actual body size, whereas these chambers are more voluminous in larger frugivores and mid-gut fermenting folivores; fore-gut fermenters show a marked decrease in capacity with increasing body size. Surface areas for absorption are related to metabolic body size, directly so in frugivores; area for absorption is relatively less in larger faunivores and more in large folivores, especially those with large stomachs. Indices of gut specialization are derived from these regressions by nonlinear transformation, with references to the main functional features of capacity for fermentation and surface area for absorption. These are directly comparable with the dietary index, derived from quantitative feeding data displayed on a three-dimensional graph, with all species within a crescentic path from 100% faunivory through 55--80% frugivory to 100% folivory, perhaps illustrating, at least for primates, the evolutionary path from primitive insectivorous forms through three major ecological grades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7441763     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051660306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  59 in total

1.  The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.

Authors:  M Clauss; R Frey; B Kiefer; M Lechner-Doll; W Loehlein; C Polster; G E Rössner; W J Streich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Molecular systematics and conservation of the langurs and leaf monkeys of South Asia.

Authors:  K Praveen Karanth
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Gut microflora of vervet and samango monkeys in relation to diet.

Authors:  M R Bruorton; C L Davis; M R Perrin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Dietary quality and encephalization in platyrrhine primates.

Authors:  Kari L Allen; Richard F Kay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The role of taste in food selection by African apes: implications for niche separation and overlap in tropical forests.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Remis
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  The digestive adaptation of flying vertebrates: high intestinal paracellular absorption compensates for smaller guts.

Authors:  Enrique Caviedes-Vidal; Todd J McWhorter; Shana R Lavin; Juan G Chediack; Christopher R Tracy; William H Karasov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Small intestinal length: a factor essential for gut adaptation.

Authors:  L T Weaver; S Austin; T J Cole
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Factors influencing bacterial microbiome composition in a wild non-human primate community in Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Jan F Gogarten; T Jonathan Davies; Jacquelynn Benjamino; J Peter Gogarten; Joerg Graf; Alexander Mielke; Roger Mundry; Michael C Nelson; Roman M Wittig; Fabian H Leendertz; Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  What volume of seeds can a chimpanzee carry in its body?

Authors:  Michio Nakamura; Tetsuya Sakamaki; Koichiro Zamma
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.163

10.  Nutritional quality of gorilla diets: consequences of age, sex, and season.

Authors:  Jessica M Rothman; Ellen S Dierenfeld; Harold F Hintz; Alice N Pell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.