Literature DB >> 7439207

Predictability of phenytoin serum levels by nomograms and clinicians.

S Vozeh, A Koelz, E Martin, H Magun, G Scollo-Lavizzari, F Follath.   

Abstract

On the basis of a reliable steady state phenytoin serum concentration on one (lower) dose, the serum concentration on a second (higher) dose was predicted in 28 patients (32 levels) by two previously reported nomograms and 3 physicians who had clinical experience with phenytoin therapy. Both nomograms and all 3 physicians on the average underestimated the serum concentration on the higher dose. Except for 1 physician, this bias was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean and SD of the prediction errors (difference between predicted and measured serum concentration) were -2.2 +/- 4.2 and -3.1 +/- 3.6 for the two nomograms and -1.0 +/- 4.0, -2.1 +/- 4.1 and -1.8 +/- 4.2 for the 3 physicians, respectively. Thus, independent of the method used, there was a large uncertainty in the prediction; the approximate 68% confidence interval of the prediction error (mean +/- SD) was almost as large as the therapeutic range of the drug. Because prediction of phenytoin serum levels based on one serum concentration measurement was found unreliable in this study, it is proposed that every patient whose dose had been increased should be under close observation until a new steady state has been confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7439207     DOI: 10.1159/000115174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Neurol        ISSN: 0014-3022            Impact factor:   1.710


  6 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin. Rationale and current status.

Authors:  M Levine; T Chang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Concentration-controlled trials. What does the future hold?

Authors:  A Johnston; D W Holt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Clinical application of the Mullen and Foster method for individualizing phenytoin dosage.

Authors:  T Valenza; A Messori; G Zaccara; G Arnetoli; C Bartoli; G Donati-Cori; G C Muscas; R Silvano; E Tendi; R Zappoli
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1984-06

4.  Predicting individual phenytoin dosage.

Authors:  S Vozeh; K T Muir; L B Sheiner; F Follath
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-04

Review 5.  Comparison of drug dosing methods.

Authors:  M E Burton; M R Vasko; D C Brater
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetics parameters. I. Michaelis-Menten model: routine clinical pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1980-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.