Literature DB >> 24214463

Methodological challenges in the study of fetal growth.

T D Abell1.   

Abstract

Several conceptual and methodological challenges must be solved in order to create knowledge that can be useful to pregnant women, their families, and any clinicians who serve them: (1) going beyond nominal and ordinal hypotheses and presenting estimates of conditional probabilities; (2) focusing on clearly defined outcomes; (3) modeling the relationship of fetal growth and length of gestation; (4) understanding the process of fetal growth even though most of our data is cross-sectional; (5) estimating the independent effects of genetics, race, ethnicity, maternal risk behaviors, medical prenatal care, and socioeconomic status on fetal growth and length of gestation; and (6) estimating the independent effects of maternal pre-pregnancy weight, weight gain during pregnancy, and nutrition on fetal growth and length of gestation.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 24214463     DOI: 10.1007/BF02692191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  171 in total

1.  Evaluation methods for intrauterine growth using neonatal fat stores instead of birth weight as outcome measures: fetal and neonatal measurements correlated with neonatal skinfold thicknesses.

Authors:  J E Sumners; G M Findley; K A Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 0.910

2.  Stress, anxiety, and birth outcomes: a critical review of the evidence.

Authors:  J Istvan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 3.  Low birth weight and prenatal nutrition: an interpretative review.

Authors:  L Bergner; M W Susser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Mathematic modeling of fetal growth: development of individual growth curve standards.

Authors:  R L Deter; I K Rossavik; R B Harrist; F P Hadlock
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Should coitus late in pregnancy be discouraged?

Authors:  J L Mills; S Harlap; E E Harley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-07-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Outcome for infants of very low birthweight: survey of world literature.

Authors:  A L Stewart; E O Reynolds; A P Lipscomb
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Psychosocial stress in pregnancy and its relation to low birth weight.

Authors:  R W Newton; L P Hunt
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-04-21

8.  An epidemiologic study of preterm delivery.

Authors:  G S Berkowitz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Low birth weight, intrauterine growth-retarded, and pre-term infants : A research strategy.

Authors:  T D Abell
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1992-12

10.  Association of maternal hematocrit with premature labor.

Authors:  E Lieberman; K J Ryan; R R Monson; S C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.