Literature DB >> 7430343

Mechanism by which bile salt disrupts the gastric mucosal barrier in the dog.

W C Duane, D M Wiegand.   

Abstract

Bile salts disrupt a functional "gastric mucosal barrier" increasing net forward-diffusion (+) of Na+ and back-diffusion (-) of H+. Studying canine Heidenhain pouches, we attempted to distinguish between two possible mechanisms for this effect: (a) mucosal uptake of bile salt with subsequent cellular injury or (b) dissolution of mucosal lipids by intralumenal bile salt. A 10 mM mixture of six conjugated bile salts simulating the proportions found in human bile induced net Na+ flux of 15.5 +/- 3.2 and net H+ flux of -9.9 +/- 3.3 mueq/min. This change was accompanied by an increase in phospholipid efflux out of gastric mucosa from a base-line value of 13.2 +/- 2.7 to 54.8 +/- 2.8 nmol/min (P < 0.001) and an increase in cholesterol efflux from 11.7 +/- 3.8 to 36.3 +/- 3.2 nmol/min (P < 0.001). Saturation with lecithin (25 mM) and cholesterol (50 mM) blocked disruption of the gastric mucosal barrier by bile salt (Na+ flux - 1.2 +/- 0.9, H+ flux 0.6 +/- 1.8 mueq/min). A 10 mM solution of taurodehydrocholate, a bile salt that does not form micelles, induced no net Na+ (-0.3 +/- 0.8) or H+ flux (-0.7 +/- 1.4) and did not increase efflux of phospholipid (11.3 +/- 1.7) or cholesterol (10.4 +/- 2.0) over base line. Bile salt was absorbed from the mixture of six conjugates at 752 +/- 85 nmol/min. Addition of subsaturation amounts of lecithin (4 mM) reduced bile salt absorption three fold to 252 +/- 57 (P < 0.001), but abnormal Na+ flux (14.1 +/- 3.4) and H+ flux (-15.6 +/- 3.5) persisted. Taurodehydrocholate was absorbed to an intermediate extent (467 +/- 116). Dissolution of mucosal lipids is apparently the mechanism by which bile salt disrupts the gastric mucosal barrier, and presumably at least one mechanism by which bile salt can injure the gastric mucosa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7430343      PMCID: PMC371541          DOI: 10.1172/JCI109932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  20 in total

1.  The intermicellar bile salt concentration in equilibrium with the mixed-micelles of human bile.

Authors:  W C Duane
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-08-25

2.  Effects of fasting on bile acid metabolism and biliary lipid composition in man.

Authors:  W C Duane; R L Ginsberg; L J Bennion
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  [The organization of biologic membranes].

Authors:  P Siekevitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Detergent action of sodium taurocholate on rat gastric mucosa.

Authors:  A J Thomas; D L Nahrwold; R C Rose
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1972-09-01

5.  Destruction of the gastric mucosal barrier by detergents and urea.

Authors:  H W Davenport
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Effect of bile salts on ionic movement across the human gastric mucosa.

Authors:  K J Ivey; L DenBesten; J A Clifton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Increased reflux of bile into the stomach in patients with gastric ulcer.

Authors:  J Rhodes; D E Barnardo; S F Phillips; R A Rovelstad; A F Hofmann
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Effect of pH on bile salt injury to mouse gastric mucosa. A light- and electron-microscopic study.

Authors:  G L Eastwood
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  The effect of healing on bile reflux in gastric ulcer.

Authors:  R B Black; G Roberts; J Rhodes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Effects of bile salts on amphibian gastric mucosa.

Authors:  W Silen; J G Forte
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1975-02
View more
  20 in total

1.  Protective effects of nonionic triblock copolymers on bile acid-mediated epithelial barrier disruption.

Authors:  Adam Edelstein; David Fink; Mark Musch; Vesta Valuckaite; Olga Zaborina; Simonida Grubjesic; Millicent A Firestone; Jeffrey B Matthews; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Alkaline reflux gastritis: a critical reappraisal.

Authors:  W P Ritchie
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Correlations between changes in indicators of gastric mucosal barrier integrity at time of exposure to "barrier breakers" and extent of hemorrhagic erosions one hour later.

Authors:  G P Morris; J L Wallace; P L Harding; E J Krausse; S J Lolle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Bile reflux due to disturbed gastric movement is a cause of spontaneous gastric ulcer in W/Wv mice.

Authors:  T Azuma; M Dojyo; S Ito; Y Yamazaki; H Miyaji; Y Ito; H Suto; M Kuriyama; T Kato; Y Kohli
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Protective effect of tauroursodeoxycholate against chenodeoxycholate-induced damage to cultured rabbit gastric cells.

Authors:  S Ota; H Tsukahara; A Terano; Y Hata; H Hiraishi; H Mutoh; T Sugimoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Ornithine decarboxylase activity during gastric ulcer healing in dogs.

Authors:  S P Marcuard; J F Silverman; J L Finley; E R Seidel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Stress ulcers during live Escherichia coli sepsis. The role of acid and bile.

Authors:  M Rees; J C Bowen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The gastric mucosal barrier. Component control.

Authors:  G L Kauffman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Action of ethanol on gastrin release in the dog.

Authors:  V E Eysselein; M V Singer; H Wentz; H Goebell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Healthy controls have as much bile reflux as gastric ulcer patients.

Authors:  N E Schindlbeck; C Heinrich; F Stellaard; G Paumgartner; S A Müller-Lissner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.