Literature DB >> 2007357

Protective effect of tauroursodeoxycholate against chenodeoxycholate-induced damage to cultured rabbit gastric cells.

S Ota1, H Tsukahara, A Terano, Y Hata, H Hiraishi, H Mutoh, T Sugimoto.   

Abstract

Ursodeoxycholate (UDC) and tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDC) have been reported to be protective against liver injury induced by other bile salts. UDC also has been shown to be effective against refluxed bile-induced gastritis after gastric surgery. However the mechanism of the therapeutic effect of UDC on gastric mucosa has not been known. In the present study, cytoprotective actions of UDC and TUDC against chenodeoxycholate (CDC)-induced gastric injury were investigated using rabbit gastric cell cultures without systemic factors. Rabbit gastric mucosal cells were cultured after the isolation of rabbit gastric cells with collagenase and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Cytotoxicity was quantified by measuring 51Cr release from prelabeled cells and MTT assay. Prostaglandin (PG) E2 was assayed by radioimmunoassay. Concentrations of CDC greater than 0.5 mM or UDC greater than 5 mM caused cellular damage and increased 51Cr release in a dose-dependent and time-dependent fashion, while TUDC up to 10 mM did not. TUDC, but not UDC, showed a significant decrease of CDC (1.5 mM)-induced 51Cr release dose dependently. The protective effect of TUDC against CDC-induced damage was confirmed by MTT assay. On phase-contrast microscopy, disruption of monolayers induced by CDC (1.5 mM) was clearly protected by TUDC (10 mM). Free radical scavengers (500 units/ml of superoxide dismutase, 300 units/ml of catalase, and 100 mM of dimethyl sulfoxide) or a calcium blocker (10(-7)-10(-5) M verapamil) did not show significant protection against CDC-induced damage. Deprivation of Ca2+ in the media did not affect CDC-induced damage. Thus free radicals or Ca2+ might not be involved in the cell toxicity of CDC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2007357     DOI: 10.1007/bf01298867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  27 in total

1.  A monolayer culture of gastric mucous cells from adult rabbits.

Authors:  S Ota; A Terano; H Hiraishi; H Mutoh; R Nakada; Y Hata; J Shiga; T Sugimoto
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1990-02

2.  Identification and characterization of a bile acid receptor in isolated liver surface membranes.

Authors:  L Accatino; F R Simon
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Oxygen metabolite-induced cytotoxicity to cultured rat gastric mucosal cells.

Authors:  H Hiraishi; A Terano; S Ota; K J Ivey; T Sugimoto
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1987-07

4.  Ileal excretion of bile acids: comparison with biliary bile composition and effect of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.

Authors:  A Stiehl; R Raedsch; G Rudolph
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Prostaglandin protects against taurocholate-induced damage to rat gastric mucosal cell culture.

Authors:  A Terano; S Ota; T Mach; H Hiraishi; J Stachura; A Tarnawski; K J Ivey
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Effects of bile salts on intermediate metabolism of the intestinal mucosa.

Authors:  J M Dietschy
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1967 Nov-Dec

7.  Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment of bile reflux gastritis.

Authors:  A B Stefaniwsky; G S Tint; J Speck; S Shefer; G Salen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Effect of sodium taurocholate on secretion by amphibian gastric mucosa in vitro.

Authors:  W D Rees; A Garner; K H Vivian; L A Turnberg
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1981-03

9.  Is ursodeoxycholic acid an effective treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis?

Authors:  R Poupon; Y Chrétien; R E Poupon; F Ballet; Y Calmus; F Darnis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-04-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Mechanism by which bile salt disrupts the gastric mucosal barrier in the dog.

Authors:  W C Duane; D M Wiegand
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanistic aspects of gastric cytoprotection--a review.

Authors:  A Terano
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1992-04

2.  Role of endonuclease activity and DNA fragmentation in Ca2+ ionophore A23187-mediated injury to rabbit isolated gastric mucosal cells.

Authors:  B L Tepperman; C W Lush; B D Soper
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Protective effect of tauroursodeoxycholate against acute gastric mucosal injury induced by hydrophobic bile salts.

Authors:  M Muraca; E Zanusso; V Cianci; M T Vilei; P Pazzi; M Dalla Libera; S Gamberini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Gastric mucosal toxicity of duodenal juice constituents in the rat. Acute studies using ex vivo rat gastric chamber model.

Authors:  D Armstrong; E R Rytina; G M Murphy; R H Dowling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Effects of 16, 16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 on lysosomal membrane stability in rat stomach.

Authors:  O Saitoh; K Nakagawa; S Asada; K Sugi; I Hirata; S Ohshiba
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Role of calcium in thromboxane B2-mediated injury to rabbit gastric mucosal cells.

Authors:  H M Wong; B D Soper; B L Tepperman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.