Literature DB >> 7418755

Relationship between the dynamic range of cochlear nerve fibres and their spontaneous activity.

E F Evans, A R Palmer.   

Abstract

The dynamic ranges of cochlear nerve fibres in cats were determined automatically and were related to the fibres' rates of spontaneous activity, in both pooled data and data from individual cochlear nerves. The dynamic range represents the range of levels of a tone at the characteristic frequency of the fibre evoking mean discharge rates between spontaneous and saturated activity. In common with the findings of other investigators, the distribution of spontaneous discharge rates was bimodal. The total population could be divided into two sub-populations with spontaneous discharge rates above and below 15 spikes/s, respectively. The mean dynamic range of fibres having spontaneous discharge rates in excess of 15 spikes/s, was 41 dB (+/- 0.65 S.E.); that for fibres with rates below 15 spikes/s was 50 dB (+/- 1.2 S.E.). While the distributions of dynamic ranges of the two populations overlapped, they were significantly different, and dynamic ranges in excess of 60 dB were only found in substantial numbers (23%) in the population having low spontaneous discharge rates. Some of these were not saturated at the highest stimulus levels used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7418755     DOI: 10.1007/bf00236671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  11 in total

1.  DISCHARGE PATTERN AND INHIBITION OF PRIMARY AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS IN THE MONKEY.

Authors:  M NOMOTO; N SUGA; Y KATSUKI
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A population study of cochlear nerve fibers: comparison of spatial distributions of average-rate and phase-locking measures of responses to single tones.

Authors:  D O Kim; C E Molnar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli.

Authors:  M B Sachs; P J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A survey of recent developments in the study of auditory physiology.

Authors:  N Y Kiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon; R A Levine
Journal:  Ciba Found Symp       Date:  1970

6.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Place and time coding of frequency in the peripheral auditory system: some physiological pros and cons.

Authors:  E F Evans
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct

8.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cochlear fibre rate--intensity functions: no evidence for basilar membrane nonlinearities.

Authors:  A R Palmer; E F Evans
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats exposed to ototoxic drugs and high-intensity sounds.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; M C Liberman; R A Levine
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  12 in total

1.  Naturalistic auditory contrast improves spectrotemporal coding in the cat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Monty A Escabí; Lee M Miller; Heather L Read; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Notched-noise precursors improve detection of low-frequency amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Ali Almishaal; Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Translational issues in cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; Erik Larsen; Michael G Heinz; Leslie Shinobu; Jonathon P Whitton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Evidence for Loss of Activity in Low-Spontaneous-Rate Auditory Nerve Fibers of Older Adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M McClaskey; James W Dias; Richard A Schmiedt; Judy R Dubno; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-12

6.  Auditory nerve fibre responses in the ferret.

Authors:  Christian J Sumner; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 7.  Encoding sound in the cochlea: from receptor potential to afferent discharge.

Authors:  Mark A Rutherford; Henrique von Gersdorff; Juan D Goutman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

9.  Perception and coding of high-frequency spectral notches: potential implications for sound localization.

Authors:  Ana Alves-Pinto; Alan R Palmer; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The dynamic range paradox: a central auditory model of intensity change detection.

Authors:  Andrew J R Simpson; Joshua D Reiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.