Literature DB >> 7397599

An evaluation of screening programs for the detection of brucellosis in dairy herds.

M D Gray, S W Martin.   

Abstract

Data were collected from approximately 1000 dairy herds, initially blood tested for brucellosis in 1977, in each of southeastern and southwestern Ontario. These data were used to evaluate three brucellosis screening programs, the area recertification program, the market cow program and the milk test program. The milk test program was the most efficient program at detecting brucellosis, 29.5% of the herds tested were classified as infected, but lacked the ability to detect a large proportion of "infected" herds (relative sensitivity = 24%). The market cow program was more efficient than the area recertification program at finding infected herds, 3.9% of the herds tested under the market cow program were infected, but had a low relative sensitivity of 12%. The area recertification program was least efficient, 2.3% of herds tested under the area recertification program were infected, but had the highest relative sensitivity (53%). The relative efficiency (predictive value) of the programs was not affected significantly by location of the herds, season of the initial test or herd size. The relative sensitivity of the milk test program was significantly higher in eastern than western Ontario and tended to decrease as herd size increased. The market cow program tended to be more sensitive in the summer months. The relative specificity of the milk test program (0.997) was higher than that of the market cow program (0.960) and the area recertification program (0.884).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7397599      PMCID: PMC1320034     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Comp Med        ISSN: 0008-4050


  8 in total

1.  EFFECT OF TIME AND STORAGE TEMPERATURE OF MILK ON THE BRUCELLA MILK RING TEST.

Authors:  D E PIETZ; R K ANDERSON; D F WERRING
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1963-12-01       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  The relative efficiency of the milk ring test and area blood tests for bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  G C JANNEY; D T BERMAN; A A ERDMANN
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1958-12-15       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  The Brucella abortus ring test.

Authors:  T MOORE
Journal:  Can J Comp Med Vet Sci       Date:  1951-02

4.  Brucella ring test sensitivity of individual and pooled bovine milks with various preservatives.

Authors:  M H Roepke; J M Patterson; B L Deyoe
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  Potential efficiency of milk ring test for detection of brucellosis.

Authors:  M H Roepke; F C Stiles
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Vaccination of cattle with killed 45-20 adjuvant vaccine. Effects on serological and Milk Ring Tests when used in cattle previously exposed to infection or vaccinated with S.19.

Authors:  B Cunningham
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1970-01-03       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  The evaluation of tests.

Authors:  S W Martin
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1977-01

8.  Brucella milk ring tests on churn samples: a three-year study.

Authors:  W J McCaughey
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1972-01-01       Impact factor: 2.695

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF BRUCELLA SUIS IN PIGS AS ZOONOTIC DISEASE IN ENDEMIC AREAS OF EAST JAVA, INDONESIA.

Authors:  Emy Koestanti S; Wiwik Misaco; Sri Chusniati; Lilik Maslachah
Journal:  Afr J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.