Literature DB >> 556679

The evaluation of tests.

S W Martin.   

Abstract

In order to correctly evaluate a test, at least four attributes should be measured: namely, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and precision. Sensitivity is the proportion of diseased animals which are correctly identified, whereas specificity is the proportion of healthy animals which are correctly identified. These two attributes are important, not only because of the reasons implied by their definition but because they influence both the apparent prevalence of disease and proportion of test-positive animals which are actually diseased. The ability of a test to give a true measurement of the substance being measured, its accuracy, and its ability to give consistent results on the same sample, its precision, are good measures of quality control. Both these attributes influence the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Inaccuracies and inconsistencies arise from the test itself, the technician and the nature of the sample being tested.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 556679      PMCID: PMC1277688     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Comp Med        ISSN: 0008-4050


  8 in total

1.  A probability graph describing the predictive value of a highly sensitive diagnostic test.

Authors:  M A Katz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Letter: Predictive value of laboratory tests.

Authors:  G T Stewart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The diagnosis, control and eradication of bovine brucellosis in Great Britain.

Authors:  W J Morgan; R A Richards
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1974-06-01       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  The Rose Bengal test.

Authors:  G Davies
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1971-04-24       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Canine pulmonary disease and the urban environment. I. The validity of radiographic examination for estimating the prevalence of pulmonary disease.

Authors:  J S Reif; W H Rhodes; D Cohen
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1970-06

6.  Further evaluations of serologic test procedures used to diagnose brucellosis.

Authors:  P Nicoletti
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 1.156

7.  Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations.

Authors:  T J Vecchio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Error rates in cervical cytological screening tests.

Authors:  D May
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  30 in total

1.  Veterinary Speciality Boards: Who Will be Guarding the Guards?

Authors:  M E White
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for diagnosis of Lumpy skin disease in cows.

Authors:  Walid S Awad; Adel K Ibrahim; Khaled Mahran; Khaled M Fararh; Mervet I Abdel Moniem
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Field validation of the use of RB51 as antigen in a complement fixation test to identify calves vaccinated with Brucella abortus RB51.

Authors:  R Adone; F Ciuchini; S Olsen
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2001-03

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of canine serum total amylase and isoamylase activity determinations.

Authors:  R M Jacobs; C L Swenson; D J Davenport; R J Murtaugh
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  A critical assessment of abattoir surveillance as a screening test for swine ascariasis.

Authors:  T M Bernardo; I R Dohoo; T Ogilvie
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.310

6.  A comparison of five serological tests for bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  I R Dohoo; P F Wright; G M Ruckerbauer; B S Samagh; F J Robertson; L B Forbes
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Tuberculosis in East Sussex. III. Comparison of post-mortem and clinical methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in badgers.

Authors:  D G Pritchard; F A Stuart; J W Wilesmith; C L Cheeseman; J I Brewer; R Bode; P E Sayers
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1986-08

8.  The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of total plasma protein in the diagnosis of traumatic reticuloperitonitis.

Authors:  R A Dubensky; M E White
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1983-07

9.  Analyses of baseline survey data on rinderpest in Bahr el Ghazal Province, with proposal of an improved vaccination strategy against rinderpest for southern Sudan.

Authors:  A A Majok; K H Zessin; M P Baumann; T B Farver
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.559

10.  Prevalence-dependent use of serological tests for diagnosing glanders in horses.

Authors:  Lisa D Sprague; Reena Zachariah; Heinrich Neubauer; Renate Wernery; Maria Joseph; Holger C Scholz; Ulrich Wernery
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.