Literature DB >> 7393417

Systematic selection of prognostic features in patients with severe head injury.

R Braakman, G J Gelpke, J D Habbema, A I Maas, J M Minderhoud.   

Abstract

In this study small sets of clinical features were identified that, when combined, yield high quality predictions of long term outcome. The study is based on a series of 305 consecutive head-injured Dutch patients, all of whom had been in coma for at least 6 hours. The overall social outcome was assessed after 6 months using the Glasgow outcome scale. Predictions of outcome were made by assigning probabilities to each possible outcome category. The prognostically most promising features recorded during the early post-traumatic course were identified, and powerful combinations of prognostic features were selected on admission and 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days after the start of coma by an appropriate statistical method. At each time point, optimal prediction required sets of only three to five features, typically including age in decades, depth and duration of coma as assessed by the Glasgow coma scale, pupil reactivity to light, and spontaneous and reflex eye movements. The method described allows bedside predictions in individual patients and provides a tool for comparing the severity of injury between series of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7393417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  31 in total

1.  Early prediction of outcome in severe head injury.

Authors:  R Braakman
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Initial predictive factors of outcome in severe non-accidental head trauma in children.

Authors:  Didier Scavarda; Charline Gabaudan; Fabrice Ughetto; Frederic Lamy; Vanessa Imada; Gabriel Lena; Olivier Paut
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Interrater Reliability of Pupillary Assessments.

Authors:  DaiWai M Olson; Sonja Stutzman; Ciji Saju; Margaret Wilson; Weidan Zhao; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Assessment of responsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A multicentre study on the reaction level scale (RLS 85).

Authors:  D Stålhammar; J E Starmark; E Holmgren; N Eriksson; C H Nordström; O Fedders; B Rosander
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Interobserver agreement in assessment of vestibulo-ocular responses.

Authors:  J H van den Berge; R Braakman; H J Schouten
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Admission of patients with severe and moderate traumatic brain injury to specialized ICU facilities: a search for triage criteria.

Authors:  Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Contribution of non-neurologic disturbances in acute physiology to the prediction of intensive care outcome after head injury or non-traumatic intracranial haemorrhage.

Authors:  M M Niskanen; A Kari; J A Hernesniemi; M P Vapalahti; E Iisalo; L Kaukinen; V Rauhala; E Saarela; P Nikki
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Risk factors for mortality within first 24 hours of head injury.

Authors:  Simmi K Ratan; Ravindra M Pandey; Rajiv Kulsreshtha; John Ratan
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Rehabilitation and outcome after severe head injury.

Authors:  R Scott-Jupp; N Marlow; N Seddon; L Rosenbloom
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  The relation between neurological trauma parameters and long-term outcome in children with closed head injury.

Authors:  M B Ruijs; F J Gabreëls; A Keyser
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.