Literature DB >> 7386734

Esophageal reconstruction.

D B Skinner.   

Abstract

Experience with 112 esophageal reconstructions in 108 patients employing an overall philosophy for this problem is summarized. In patients with malignant disease, the reconstruction should be the quickest and simplest possible, and a higher long-term complication rate caused by the reconstruction may be acceptable. Experience with the use of the stomach demonstrates that the mortality and complication rates are acceptable but that the stomach has the clear disadvantage of a higher incidence of postoperative aspiration pneumonia, which adds to mortality, and an incidence of serious complications from reflux esophagitis. These late specific complications after esophagogastrostomy are not acceptable in the treatment of patients with benign disease, so the use of intestinal segments, descending colon or jejunum is advocated. Both have the hazard of venous infarction, although the risk of anastomotic leakage, aspiration and late esophagitis is diminished or eliminated. In desperate circumstances, an extracorporeal tube to restore alimentation may be useful in reconstructing the esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7386734     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90387-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  16 in total

1.  Synchronous electrogastrographic and manometric study of the stomach as an esophageal substitute.

Authors:  Ferenc Izbéki; Tibor Wittmann; Sándor Odor; Balázs Botos; Aron Altorjay
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Risk factors of reflux esophagitis in the cervical remnant following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

Authors:  Kazuhito Yajima; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Tatsuo Kanda; Atsushi Matsuki; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Isoperistaltic left colic graft interposition via a retrosternal approach for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a caustic stricture: mortality, morbidity, and functional results.

Authors:  Abdelkader Boukerrouche
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Community-acquired pneumonia during long-term follow-up of patients after radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of incidence and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Takaaki Hanyu; Tatsuo Kanda; Kazuhito Yajima; Yoshinari Tanabe; Shintaro Komukai; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Tsutomu Suzuki; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Dukes A carcinoma after colonic interposition for oesophageal stricture.

Authors:  A D Houghton; M Jourdan; I McColl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Anastomotic leakage after resection and bypass for esophageal cancer: lessons learned from the past.

Authors:  T Lorentz; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Radiology of colonic interposition and its associated complications.

Authors:  L R Christensen; J Shapir
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1986

8.  A double stapled technique for oesophago-enteric anastomosis.

Authors:  A Kotru; A-K John; E-P Dewar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy.

Authors:  Sadik Yildirim; Hakan Köksal; Fevzi Celayir; Levent Erdem; Muharrem Oner; Adil Baykan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Anastomosis.

Authors:  R Bardini; M Asolati; A Ruol; L Bonavina; S Baseggio; A Peracchia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.