Literature DB >> 7374763

Ferromagnetic coupling to muscle receptors as a basis for geomagnetic field sensitivity in animals.

D Presti, J D Pettigrew.   

Abstract

Over the past decade several investigators have provided convincing evidence that the orientation of pigeons and other birds during homing and migrational activities is significantly affected by Earth-strength (less than or equal to 0.5 G) magnetic fields. The presumed mediator of such effects would be a highly sensitive magnetoreceptor which the birds would normally use to extract navigational information from the geomagnetic field. The recently reported measurement of magnet remanence in honeybees and in homing pigeons has stimulated interest in the possibility that the magnetically sensitive structure may be constructed from permanently magnetic material. Here we report the detection of permanently magnetic material in the neck musculature of pigeons (Columba livia) and migratory white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys). We propose that a magnetic field detector might involve the coupling of magnetic particles to a sensitive muscle receptor such as a spindle. A detection mechanism of this kind could account for the difficulties encountered in conditioning immobile homing pigeons to magnetic field changes and for the puzzling requirement of movement in other behavioural experiments involving pigeons and magnetic fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7374763     DOI: 10.1038/285099a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  9 in total

1.  Magnetoreception in birds: different physical processes for two types of directional responses.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Katrin Stapput; Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2007-03-21

2.  Visual but not trigeminal mediation of magnetic compass information in a migratory bird.

Authors:  Manuela Zapka; Dominik Heyers; Christine M Hein; Svenja Engels; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Jörg Hans; Simon Weiler; David Dreyer; Dmitry Kishkinev; J Martin Wild; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Magnetoreception in eusocial insects: an update.

Authors:  Eliane Wajnberg; Daniel Acosta-Avalos; Odivaldo Cambraia Alves; Jandira Ferreira de Oliveira; Robert B Srygley; Darci M S Esquivel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Avian magnetite-based magnetoreception: a physiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Hervé Cadiou; Peter A McNaughton
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  No evidence for intracellular magnetite in putative vertebrate magnetoreceptors identified by magnetic screening.

Authors:  Nathaniel B Edelman; Tanja Fritz; Simon Nimpf; Paul Pichler; Mattias Lauwers; Robert W Hickman; Artemis Papadaki-Anastasopoulou; Lyubov Ushakova; Thomas Heuser; Guenter P Resch; Martin Saunders; Jeremy A Shaw; David A Keays
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Numerical tests of magnetoreception models assisted with behavioral experiments on American cockroaches.

Authors:  Kai Sheng Lee; Rainer Dumke; Tomasz Paterek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Activation changes in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) brain areas evoked by alterations of the earth magnetic field.

Authors:  Nina Keary; Hans-Joachim Bischof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Magnetic control of heterogeneous ice nucleation with nanophase magnetite: Biophysical and agricultural implications.

Authors:  Atsuko Kobayashi; Masamoto Horikawa; Joseph L Kirschvink; Harry N Golash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Moderate strength (0.23-0.28 T) static magnetic fields (SMF) modulate signaling and differentiation in human embryonic cells.

Authors:  Zhiyun Wang; Anshu Sarje; Pao-Lin Che; Kevin J Yarema
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.