Literature DB >> 19865170

Visual but not trigeminal mediation of magnetic compass information in a migratory bird.

Manuela Zapka1, Dominik Heyers, Christine M Hein, Svenja Engels, Nils-Lasse Schneider, Jörg Hans, Simon Weiler, David Dreyer, Dmitry Kishkinev, J Martin Wild, Henrik Mouritsen.   

Abstract

Magnetic compass information has a key role in bird orientation, but the physiological mechanisms enabling birds to sense the Earth's magnetic field remain one of the unresolved mysteries in biology. Two biophysical mechanisms have become established as the most promising magnetodetection candidates. The iron-mineral-based hypothesis suggests that magnetic information is detected by magnetoreceptors in the upper beak and transmitted through the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve to the brain. The light-dependent hypothesis suggests that magnetic field direction is sensed by radical pair-forming photopigments in the eyes and that this visual signal is processed in cluster N, a specialized, night-time active, light-processing forebrain region. Here we report that European robins with bilateral lesions of cluster N are unable to show oriented magnetic-compass-guided behaviour but are able to perform sun compass and star compass orientation behaviour. In contrast, bilateral section of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve in European robins did not influence the birds' ability to use their magnetic compass for orientation. These data show that cluster N is required for magnetic compass orientation in this species and indicate that it may be specifically involved in processing of magnetic compass information. Furthermore, the data strongly suggest that a vision-mediated mechanism underlies the magnetic compass in this migratory songbird, and that the putative iron-mineral-based receptors in the upper beak connected to the brain by the trigeminal nerve are neither necessary nor sufficient for magnetic compass orientation in European robins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19865170     DOI: 10.1038/nature08528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  27 in total

1.  Ultrastructural analysis of a putative magnetoreceptor in the beak of homing pigeons.

Authors:  Gerta Fleissner; Elke Holtkamp-Rötzler; Marianne Hanzlik; Michael Winklhofer; Günther Fleissner; Nikolai Petersen; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Uniform magnetic fields and double-wrapped coil systems: improved techniques for the design of bioelectromagnetic experiments.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Cryptochromes and neuronal-activity markers colocalize in the retina of migratory birds during magnetic orientation.

Authors:  Henrik Mouritsen; Ulrike Janssen-Bienhold; Miriam Liedvogel; Gesa Feenders; Julia Stalleicken; Petra Dirks; Reto Weiler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evidence that pigeons orient to geomagnetic intensity during homing.

Authors:  Todd E Dennis; Matt J Rayner; Michael M Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Structure and function of the vertebrate magnetic sense.

Authors:  M M Walker; C E Diebel; C V Haugh; P M Pankhurst; J C Montgomery; C R Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Lateralized activation of Cluster N in the brains of migratory songbirds.

Authors:  Miriam Liedvogel; Gesa Feenders; Kazuhiro Wada; Nikolaus F Troje; Erich D Jarvis; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Hu protein as an early marker of neuronal phenotypic differentiation by subependymal zone cells of the adult songbird forebrain.

Authors:  K Barami; K Iversen; H Furneaux; S A Goldman
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1995-09

9.  Does the avian ophthalmic nerve carry magnetic navigational information?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  A visual pathway links brain structures active during magnetic compass orientation in migratory birds.

Authors:  Dominik Heyers; Martina Manns; Harald Luksch; Onur Güntürkün; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  93 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms for Magnetosensation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Clites; Jonathan T Pierce
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Clusters of iron-rich cells in the upper beak of pigeons are macrophages not magnetosensitive neurons.

Authors:  Christoph Daniel Treiber; Marion Claudia Salzer; Johannes Riegler; Nathaniel Edelman; Cristina Sugar; Martin Breuss; Paul Pichler; Herve Cadiou; Martin Saunders; Mark Lythgoe; Jeremy Shaw; David Anthony Keays
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sensory biology: Search for the compass needles.

Authors:  Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A new type of radical-pair-based model for magnetoreception.

Authors:  A Marshall Stoneham; Erik M Gauger; Kyriakos Porfyrakis; Simon C Benjamin; Brendon W Lovett
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Acuity of a cryptochrome and vision-based magnetoreception system in birds.

Authors:  Ilia A Solov'yov; Henrik Mouritsen; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Differential effects of magnetic pulses on the orientation of naturally migrating birds.

Authors:  Richard A Holland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Brain regions associated with visual cues are important for bird migration.

Authors:  Orsolya Vincze; Csongor I Vágási; Péter L Pap; Gergely Osváth; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Magnetic field perception in the rainbow trout Oncorynchus mykiss: magnetite mediated, light dependent or both?

Authors:  Jens Hellinger; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Effects of disorder and motion in a radical pair magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Jason C S Lau; Nicola Wagner-Rundell; Christopher T Rodgers; Nicholas J B Green; P J Hore
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird.

Authors:  Svenja Engels; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Nele Lefeldt; Christine Maira Hein; Manuela Zapka; Andreas Michalik; Dana Elbers; Achim Kittel; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.