Literature DB >> 7374727

Do patients in whom myocardial infarction has been ruled out have a better prognosis after hospitalization than those surviving infarction?

J S Schroeder, I H Lamb, M Hu.   

Abstract

To determine the prognosis after hospitalization of patients hospitalized with acute chest pain in a coronary-care unit, we undertook a prospective study of 211 consecutive admissions to the Stanford Coronary Care Unit. On the basis of predetermined criteria, 16 patients were found to have noncardiac chest pain, and myocardial infarction was ruled out in 89, one of whom died in the hospital. Infarction was documented in 84 others, six of whom died in the hospital. Prospective follow-up after hospitalization was carried out in the 88 patients in whom infarction was ruled out and in the 78 patients who survived infarction. The rate of myocardial infarction or death was 8.0 per cent at six months and 21.6 per cent at a mean of 27.8 months of follow-up for patients who had infarction ruled out, as compared with 7.7 per cent at six months and 21.8 per cent at a mean of 27.8 months of follow-up for those who had a documented infarction during the initial hospitalization. Cardiomegaly, congestive heart failure, and angina after discharge from the hospital tended to increase the risk of morbidity and mortality in both groups. The patient hospitalized with acute ischemic chest pain without evolution of a myocardial infarction has a six to 24-month prognosis similar to that of the patient hospitalized with an acute infarction, and therefore requires similar diagnostic and therapeutic assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7374727     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198007033030101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  16 in total

1.  The status of medical education for black Americans.

Authors:  N Nager; F Saadatmand
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Predictive value of prior Rose angina for myocardial infarction confirmation after emergency admissions.

Authors:  L J Haywood; C Faucett; M deGuzman; K Ell; S Norris; E Butts
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  The reporting of cardiac troponin.

Authors:  Peter E Hickman; Gus Koerbin; Jill Tate
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2003-11

4.  Prognosis of patients discharged from a coronary care unit.

Authors:  H C Smyllie
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-08-30

5.  'Ruling out' myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit.

Authors:  G H Murata
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-05

6.  Ruling out myocardial infarction--updating a good idea.

Authors:  L Goldman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-05

Review 7.  "But will it help my patients with myocardial infarction?" The implications of recent trials for everyday country folk.

Authors:  J R Mitchell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-10-23

8.  Prognosis and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients admitted with chest pain without confirmed acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J K Madsen; M Stubgaard; H E Utne; J F Hansen; K van Duijvendijk; J H Reiber; K Christoffersen
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-02

9.  Clinical characteristics and current management of medically refractory unstable angina.

Authors:  J S Rankin; J R Newton; R M Califf; R H Jones; A S Wechsler; H N Oldham; W G Wolfe; J E Lowe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Ischaemic heart disease and prodromes of sudden cardiac death. Is it possible to identify high risk groups for sudden cardiac death?

Authors:  J K Madsen
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.