Literature DB >> 7374097

Assessment of various factors influencing esophageal pressure measurement. II. Significance of physiological factors in intraluminal manometry.

T R Weihrauch, P Vallerius, H Alpers, K Ewe.   

Abstract

In the second part of this study the effect of age, sex, body size, body weight and timing of the manometric examination (morning vs. noon) on esophageal pressure measurement was investigated in a total of 119 healthy subjects, using an electromagnetic microtransducer. Additionally intraindividual variation of pressures was studied over a period of 6 months. Of these parameters only age influenced upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure significantly: The mean UES pressure of younger subjects (20-49 years) was significantly higher (144.4 +/- 8.6 mmHg) compared to that of older subjects (50-80 years) where a mean pressure of 103.4 +/- 7.2 mmHg was recorded (p less than 0.0005). Intraindividual variation of pressures in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was considerable but exceeded only in a few cases the normal pressure range which was defined as M +/- 2 S. The results indicate that age, sex, different body weight and body size do not influence significantly the normal values obtained by a quantitative manometric method. In UES manometry however, the diminished resting pressure in the older patient must be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7374097     DOI: 10.1007/BF01476570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0023-2173


  16 in total

1.  PRESBYESOPHAGUS: ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN NONAGENARIANS.

Authors:  K H SOERGEL; F F ZBORALSKE; J R AMBERG
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  [Intraluminal manometry by means of a new electronic measuring device].

Authors:  C Förster; T R Weihrauch; K D Höhle; W Seitz
Journal:  Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med       Date:  1976

3.  The present status of esophageal manometry.

Authors:  M Wienbeck
Journal:  Acta Hepatogastroenterol (Stuttg)       Date:  1976-02

4.  Effect of continuous infusion of pentagastrin on lower esophageal sphincter pressure and gastric acid secretion in normal subjects.

Authors:  C O Walker; S A Frank; J Manton; J S Fordtran
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Symptomatic diffuse esophageal spasm. Manometric follow-up and response to cholinergic stimulation and cholinesterase inhibition.

Authors:  M Mellow
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Proceedings: The estimation of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure by the station pull-through technique.

Authors:  J G Temple; D Hay; R J Goodall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  A new electronic transducer system for gastrointestinal pressure studies.

Authors:  C F Förster; T R Weihrauch; A Brummer; P Vallerius; H Lehmann
Journal:  Med Prog Technol       Date:  1977-04-25

8.  Effect of infusion on force of closure measurements in the human esophagus.

Authors:  C E Pope
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Assessment of various factors influencing esophageal pressure measurement. I. Significance of methodical factors in intraluminal manometry.

Authors:  T R Weihrauch; A Brummer; H Biewener; K Ewe
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1980-03-17

10.  Relation of gastroesophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal contractile waves to age in man.

Authors:  A Csendes; E Guiraldes; A Bancalari; I Braghetto; M Ayala
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  11 in total

1.  Normal pharyngoesophageal motility. A study of 50 healthy subjects.

Authors:  J A Wilson; A Pryde; A Cecilia; C C Macintyre; R C Heading
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  The use of intraluminal manometry to assess upper esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  B T Massey
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 3.  Effect of aging on the deglutitive oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal motor function.

Authors:  R Shaker; I M Lang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Long-term esophageal manometry in healthy subjects. Evaluation of normal values and influence of age.

Authors:  R J Adamek; M Wegener; M Wienbeck; B Gielen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Assessment of various factors influencing esophageal pressure measurement. I. Significance of methodical factors in intraluminal manometry.

Authors:  T R Weihrauch; A Brummer; H Biewener; K Ewe
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1980-03-17

6.  Are manometric parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx affected by age and gender?

Authors:  Margot A van Herwaarden; Phil O Katz; R Matthew Gideon; Jeff Barrett; June A Castell; S Achem; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux--pathogenesis and clinical implications.

Authors:  T R Weihrauch
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Upper gastrointestinal investigations before gastric banding.

Authors:  Marco Bueter; Andreas Thalheimer; Carel W le Roux; Alexander Wierlemann; Florian Seyfried; Martin Fein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Dysphagia in the elderly.

Authors:  W G Paterson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Anomalies of peristalsis in idiopathic diffuse oesophageal spasm.

Authors:  M D Kaye
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.