Literature DB >> 7365936

Home or hospital births?

G D Adamson, D J Gare.   

Abstract

Advocates of home birth cite psychological and medical benefits in their demand for a different approach to birthing procedures. Opponents emphasize the risks of this approach and point to improved outcomes through medical progress available only in hospitals, as well as to recent, less positive European attitudes toward home births. A review of the literature shows that present data are limited and do not conclusively support either opinion. It is essential that the medical profession become actively involved in an objective analysis of the merits and deficiencies of home and hospital birth settings. This participation should ensure that new approaches to birth will maintain the highest possible standards in maternal, fetal, and neonatal welfare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7365936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  7 in total

1.  Alternative birthing.

Authors:  R J Simkin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The home birth controversy.

Authors:  T Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  T Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Neonatal mortality in Missouri home births, 1978-84.

Authors:  W F Schramm; D E Barnes; J M Bakewell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Statement and resolution on the setting of obstetrical delivery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1983-05

6.  Care in a birth room versus a conventional setting: a controlled trial.

Authors:  M Klein; A Papageorgiou; R Westreich; L Spector-Dunsky; V Elkins; M S Kramer; M M Gelfand
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Out-of-hospital births, U.S., 1978: birth weight and Apgar scores as measures of outcome.

Authors:  E R Declercq
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.