Literature DB >> 3605472

Neonatal mortality in Missouri home births, 1978-84.

W F Schramm, D E Barnes, J M Bakewell.   

Abstract

A study was conducted of 4,054 Missouri home births occurring from 1978 through 1984. Of the 3,645 births whose planning status was identified, 3,067 (84 per cent) were planned to be at home. Neonatal mortality was elevated for both planned (17 observed deaths vs 8.59 expected deaths) and unplanned home births (45 observed vs 33.19 expected) compared with physician-attended hospital births. Nearly all of the mortality excess for planned home births occurred in association with lesser trained attendants (12 observed vs 4.42 expected), while for unplanned home births the excess was entirely among infants weighing 1500 grams or more (19 observed vs 3.50 expected). For planned home births attended by physicians, certified nurse-midwives, or Missouri Midwife Association recognized midwives, there was little difference between observed and expected deaths (5 observed vs 3.92 expected). There also was little difference in deaths for unplanned home births weighing less than 1500 grams (26 observed vs 29.69 expected) compared with hospital births. The study provides evidence of the importance of having skilled attendants present at planned home births.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3605472      PMCID: PMC1647261          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.77.8.930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes of elective home births: a series of 1,146 cases.

Authors:  L E Mehl; G H Peterson; M Whitt; W E Hawes
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Neonatal outcome in planned v unplanned out-of-hospital births in Kentucky.

Authors:  M W Hinds; G H Bergeisen; D T Allen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Home birth.

Authors:  W H Pearse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Indirect standardization of neonatal mortality for birth weight.

Authors:  J C Kleinman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Home or hospital births?

Authors:  G D Adamson; D J Gare
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Home delivery and neonatal mortality in North Carolina.

Authors:  C A Burnett; J A Jones; J Rooks; C H Chen; C W Tyler; C A Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-12-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Childbirthing centers: delivering more for less.

Authors:  R W Lubic
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.220

8.  Four years' experience with home birth by licensed midwives in Arizona.

Authors:  D A Sullivan; R Beeman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Out-of-hospital delivery in Washington State, 1975 to 1977.

Authors:  K K Shy; F Frost; J Ullom
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  The safety of home birth: the farm study.

Authors:  A M Duran
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Perinatal and infant mortality rates and place of birth in Italy, 1980.

Authors:  F Parazzini; C La Vecchia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Authors:  Kenneth C Johnson; Betty-Anne Daviss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

4.  Place of birth: a woman's choice.

Authors:  E K Ernst
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Planned and unplanned home births and hospital births in Calgary, Alberta, 1984-87.

Authors:  T J Abernathy; D M Lentjes
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Parturition: places and priorities.

Authors:  W H Pearse
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom?

Authors:  T Dowswell; J G Thornton; J Hewison; R J Lilford; J Raisler; A Macfarlane; G Young; M Newburn; R Dodds; R S Settatree
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-23

Review 8.  [Contra home delivery].

Authors:  D Berg
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  "I got to catch my own baby": a qualitative study of out of hospital birth.

Authors:  Mickey Sperlich; Cynthia Gabriel
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.