Literature DB >> 7365398

An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.

M C Bushnell, S J Weiss.   

Abstract

Instrumental treadle press and nonreinforced key peck responses were monitored during discrimination training and generalization testing in pigeons on positive and negative reinforcement schedules. In Experiment 1, six pigeons pressed a treadle for food on a multiple variable-interval extinction schedule. In Experiment 2, three pigeons pressed a treadle to avoid shock on a multiple free-operant avoidance extinction schedule. Different color keylights signaled S+ and S- components. Some positive behavioral contrast occurred during discrimination training, but the effect was small. Pecking occurred to the S+ keylight in Experiment 1 but not in Experiment 2. On stimulus generalization tests, all subjects displayed a positive peak shift when pressing the treadle for food or to avoid shock. However, peak shift was not found for nonreinforced "autopecks" on the stimulus key, although an area shift was observed in Experiment 1. This is the first demonstration of peak shift for pigeons pressing treadles and the only reliable demonstration of peak shift when negative reinforcement maintained responding. These results, in combination with previous demonstrations of peak shift for rats pressing levers and pigeons pecking keys, indicate that peak shift is a general by-product of operant discrimination learning, since it occurs across a variety of the organisms, responses, and reinforcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7365398      PMCID: PMC1332916          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  42 in total

1.  WAVELENGTH GENERALIZATION AFTER DISCRIMINATION LEARNING WITH AND WITHOUT ERRORS.

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  OPERANT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AS A FUNCTION OF REWARD EXPOSURE.

Authors:  J F DICKSON; D R THOMAS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1963-10

3.  BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST DURING MULTIPLE AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES.

Authors:  G A WERTHEIM
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Peak shift as a function of multiple schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J Dysart; M H Marx; J McLean; J A Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The Aversive Control of an Operant Discrimination.

Authors:  J B Appel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Behavioral contrast and relative reinforcement frequency in two multiple schedules.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.

Authors:  S J Weiss; R D Weissman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Positive behavioral contrast when pigeons press treadles during multiple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incentive processes and the peak shift.

Authors:  S J Weiss; R J Dacanay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Positive and negative contrast as a function of component duration for key pecking and treadle pressing.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Generalization peak shift in rats under conditions of positive reinforcement and avoidance.

Authors:  S J Weiss; C W Schindler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.