Literature DB >> 7364607

Maximal oxygen uptake during free, tethered, and flume swimming.

A Bonen, B A Wilson, M Yarkony, A N Belcastro.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was 1) to compare the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) obtained in swimmers during tethered swimming, free swimming, and flume swimming, and 2) to determine whether an arm-ergometer test would provide comparable results. In the first experiments the VO2max for tethered swimming (2.67 +/- 0.26 l/min) and flume swimming (2.62 +/- 0.26 l/min) were not different (P greater than 0.05) and were highly correlated (r = 0.99). However, with arm ergometry a significantly lower VO2max (2.36 +/- 0.24 l/min) occurred from those found in the two swimming tests (P less than 0.05). Other experiments demonstrated that the tethered swimming VO2max (3.53 +/- 0.27 l/min) and the free swimming VO2max (3.55 +/- 0.28 l/min) also provide results that were similar (P greater than 0.05) and highly correlated with each other (r = 0.99). Differences between tethered and flume swimming, and tethered and free swimming were small, being 1.2 +/- 1.6% and 0.6 +/- 0.9%, respectively. Differences between tethered swimming and arm ergometry VO2max were large, 14.7 +/- 2.4%, despite the high correlation (r = 0.97) between these measurements. Predictions of a swimming VO2max from the arm-ergometer data yielded a considerable error (+/-7.1% and +/-7.4%). The present results indicate that flume swimming, free swimming, and tethered swimming yield essentially identical VO2max results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7364607     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.2.232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol        ISSN: 0161-7567


  14 in total

Review 1.  Physiological assessment of head-out aquatic exercises in healthy subjects: a qualitative review.

Authors:  Tiago M Barbosa; Daniel A Marinho; Victor M Reis; António J Silva; José A Bragada
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Assessment of the specificity of cardiopulmonary response during tethered swimming using a new snorkel device.

Authors:  Marco Pinna; Raffaele Milia; Silvana Roberto; Elisabetta Marongiu; Sergio Olla; Andrea Loi; Matteo Ortu; Gian Mario Migliaccio; Filippo Tocco; Alberto Concu; Antonio Crisafulli
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  A comparison of practical assessment methods to determine treadmill, cycle, and elliptical ergometer VO2 peak.

Authors:  Ryan J Mays; Nicholas F Boér; Lisa M Mealey; Kevin H Kim; Fredric L Goss
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Physiological and muscle enzyme adaptations to two different intensities of swim training.

Authors:  M E Houston; D M Wilson; H J Green; J A Thomson; D A Ranney
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1981

5.  Anaerobic and aerobic components during arm-crank exercise in sprint and middle-distance swimmers.

Authors:  B Mercier; P Granier; J Mercier; J Trouquet; C Préfaut
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

Review 6.  Energetics of competitive swimming. Implications for training programmes.

Authors:  H M Toussaint; A P Hollander
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Maximal aerobic power measurement in runners and swimmers.

Authors:  I Corry; N Powers
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming.

Authors:  Per-Ludvik Kjendlie; Frank Ingjer; Ørjan Madsen; Robert Keig Stallman; James Stray-Gundersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Applied physiology of swimming.

Authors:  J M Lavoie; R R Montpetit
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  How Much the Swimming Performance Leading to Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games Was Impaired Due to the Covid-19 Lockdown?

Authors:  Mário J Costa; Nuno D Garrido; Daniel A Marinho; Catarina C Santos
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.