Literature DB >> 14652762

Differences in the energy cost between children and adults during front crawl swimming.

Per-Ludvik Kjendlie1, Frank Ingjer, Ørjan Madsen, Robert Keig Stallman, James Stray-Gundersen.   

Abstract

There is little information available about the swimming economy of children. The aim of this study was to examine any possible differences in swimming economy in children and adults, swimming front crawl submaximally. Swimming economy was compared in adults [ n=13, aged 21.4 (3.7) years] and children [n=10, aged 11.8 (0.8) years] tested at four submaximal 6-min workloads. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured with Douglas bags in a 25-m pool and pacer lights were used to control the velocities. Swimming economy was scaled to body size using mass (BM), body surface area (BSA) and body length (BL). Children had lower VO2 (litres per minute) at a given velocity than the adults, with 1.86 (0.28) and 2.39 (0.20) l min(-1) respectively (at 1.00 m s(-1)). When scaling for size, children had higher VO2 measured in litres per square metre per minute and millilitres per kilogram per minute (divided by BSA and BM) than adults. The VO2 divided by BL was found not to differ between the two groups. The O2 cost of swimming 1 m at a velocity of 1.00 m s(-1) was lower in the children [31.0 (4.6) ml m(-1)] than in the adults [39.9 (3.3) ml m(-1) P<0.01], probably due to a lower total drag in the children. The results also showed that for children a relationship between swimming velocity cubed and VO2 exists as shown earlier for adults. It is concluded that, when scaling for BSA and BM, children are less economical than adults, when scaling for BL, children are equally economical, and when considering energy cost per metre and absolute VO2, children are more economical than the adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14652762     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  32 in total

1.  Longitudinal changes in distance-running performance of young males.

Authors:  G S Krahenbuhl; D W Morgan; R P Pangrazi
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Energetics of swimming in man.

Authors:  P E Di Prampero; D R Pendergast; D W Wilson; D W Rennie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Comparison of the physiologic response to varying intensities of submaximal work in tethered swimming and treadmill running.

Authors:  J R Magel
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Metabolic and cardiorespiratory response during free swimming and treadmill walking.

Authors:  W D McArdle; R M Glaser; J R Magel
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Effects of body size, body density, gender and growth on underwater torque.

Authors:  P Zamparo; G Antonutto; C Capelli; M P Francescato; M Girardis; R Sangoi; R G Soule; D R Pendergast
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Relationship between oxygen uptake, stroke rate and swimming velocity in competitive swimming.

Authors:  K Wakayoshi; L J D'Acquisto; J M Cappaert; J P Troup
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  Maximal oxygen uptake during free, tethered, and flume swimming.

Authors:  A Bonen; B A Wilson; M Yarkony; A N Belcastro
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1980-02

8.  Determinants of the energy cost of front-crawl swimming in children.

Authors:  B Poujade; C A Hautier; A Rouard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Bioenergetics and biomechanics of front crawl swimming.

Authors:  C Capelli; P Zamparo; A Cigalotto; M P Francescato; R G Soule; B Termin; D R Pendergast; P E Di Prampero
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1995-02

10.  Oxygen uptake during running as related to body mass in circumpubertal boys: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  B Sjödin; J Svedenhag
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992
View more
  12 in total

1.  The determinants of performance in master swimmers: an analysis of master world records.

Authors:  P Zamparo; G Gatta; P E di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The determinants of performance in master swimmers: a cross-sectional study on the age-related changes in propelling efficiency, hydrodynamic position and energy cost of front crawl.

Authors:  P Zamparo; A Dall'ora; A Toneatto; M Cortesi; G Gatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Energetics of swimming: a historical perspective.

Authors:  P Zamparo; C Capelli; D Pendergast
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Examining the accumulated oxygen deficit method in breaststroke swimming.

Authors:  Victor Machado Reis; Daniel Almeida Marinho; Fernando Policarpo Barbosa; António Malvas Reis; Laura Guidetti; António José Silva
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The critical velocity in swimming.

Authors:  Pietro E di Prampero; Jeanne Dekerle; Carlo Capelli; Paola Zamparo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Combined strength and endurance training in competitive swimmers.

Authors:  Stian Aspenes; Per-Ludvik Kjendlie; Jan Hoff; Jan Helgerud
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  The energy cost of swimming and its determinants.

Authors:  Paola Zamparo; Matteo Cortesi; Giorgio Gatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Comparative analysis of the energy cost during front crawl swimming in children and adults.

Authors:  Sébastien Ratel; Bastien Poujade
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The interplay between propelling efficiency, hydrodynamic position and energy cost of front crawl in 8 to 19-year-old swimmers.

Authors:  P Zamparo; S Lazzer; C Antoniazzi; S Cedolin; R Avon; C Lesa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Effects of age and gender on the propelling efficiency of the arm stroke.

Authors:  Paola Zamparo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.