Literature DB >> 7356928

Effect of age on Arden grating acuity.

H W Skalka.   

Abstract

Arden grating test scores were obtained for 100 normal subjects under standardised testing conditions. While previously published ranges of interocular conguity were corroborated, a significant increase in test scores with increasing age was noted. This effect of age has not been previously reported. Physiological considerations suggest that such age dependency might have been expected. It is suggested that ranges of normal values be established for each of several age groups.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7356928      PMCID: PMC1039341          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.64.1.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  9 in total

1.  Senile changes in visual acuity.

Authors:  R A Weale
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1975-04

Review 2.  The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance.

Authors:  G B Arden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Grating test of contrast sensitivity in patients with retrobulbar neuritis.

Authors:  G B Arden; A G Gucukoglu
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-09

4.  The Arden grating test of visual function: a preliminary study of its practicability and application in a rural community in north-west Iran.

Authors:  D C Minassian; B R Jones; A Zargarizadeh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The scotometer. A device for measuring macular recovery time.

Authors:  P Henkind; I M Siegel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Macular function and the photostress test 1.

Authors:  S L Severin; R L Tour; R H Kershaw
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-01

7.  Contrast sensitivity in macular disease. A preliminary report.

Authors:  J Sjöstrand; L Frisén
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1977-06

8.  A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma.

Authors:  G B Arden; J J Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with cerebral lesions.

Authors:  I Bodis-Wollner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-11-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  FACT contrast sensitivity as a diagnostic tool in glaucoma: FACT contrast sensitivity in glaucoma.

Authors:  Sumru Onal; Ozlem Yenice; Sezen Cakir; Ahmet Temel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  The objective assessment of contrast sensitivity function by electrophysiological means.

Authors:  J W Howe; K W Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Contrast sensitivity gratings in glaucoma family screening.

Authors:  R A Hitchings; D J Powell; G B Arden; R M Carter
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Grating test of contrast sensitivity in patients with Minamata disease.

Authors:  K Mukuno; S Ishikawa; R Okamura
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Spatial and spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of normal and glaucoma eyes.

Authors:  M Korth; F Horn; B Storck; J B Jonas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Brightness discrimination and contrast sensitivity in chronic glaucoma--a clinical study.

Authors:  S L Teoh; D Allan; G N Dutton; W S Foulds
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Contrast sensitivity in asymmetric glaucoma.

Authors:  M A Motolko; C D Phelps
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  The Arden grating acuity: effect of age and optical factors in the normal patient, with prediction of the false negative rate in screening for glaucoma.

Authors:  H Singh; R L Cooper; V A Alder; G J Crawford; A Terrell; I J Constable
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Use of contrast sensitivity measurement in the detection of subclinical ethambutol toxic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  J F Salmon; T R Carmichael; N H Welsh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Impaired contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with and without retinopathy: a new technique for rapid assessment.

Authors:  S Della Sala; G Bertoni; L Somazzi; F Stubbe; A J Wilkins
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.