Literature DB >> 7295612

The Arden grating acuity: effect of age and optical factors in the normal patient, with prediction of the false negative rate in screening for glaucoma.

H Singh, R L Cooper, V A Alder, G J Crawford, A Terrell, I J Constable.   

Abstract

The Arden contrast sensitivity was investigated in normal persons, cataract eyes, and glaucoma patients with only plates 6 and 7 of the Arden grating set. The mean score of 90 normal eyes on plate 6 was 9.50 +/- 2.29 and on plate 7 it was 9.44 +/- 2.32. The mean scores of patients with early cataract were 14.51 +/- 2.99 on plate 6 and 13.74 +/- 3.26 on plate 7. Several patients with cataract missed the grating on plate 7. Mydriasis and miosis did not affect contrast sensitivity in normal eyes. Mydriasis significantly improved contrast sensitivity in patients with early cataract. In patients with glaucoma enlargement of the pupil from a miotic state to near normal size significantly improved contrast sensitivity. It is predicted that if plate 6 and 7 are used in mass screening for glaucoma in the elderly, there will be a false negative rate of 83% for plate 6 and 52% for plate 7. A false positive rate of 17% is predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7295612      PMCID: PMC1039572          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.65.8.518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

Review 1.  The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance.

Authors:  G B Arden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Effect of age on Arden grating acuity.

Authors:  H W Skalka
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Contrast sensitivity in macular disease. A preliminary report.

Authors:  J Sjöstrand; L Frisén
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1977-06

5.  A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma.

Authors:  G B Arden; J J Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Mass screening of glaucoma and other eye disease using the Arden grating test.

Authors:  R L Cooper; I Constable; A Terrell
Journal:  Aust J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-05

7.  Vision through cataracts.

Authors:  R Hess; G Woo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma.

Authors:  A Atkin; I Bodis-Wollner; M Wolkstein; A Moss; S M Podos
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.258

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  FACT contrast sensitivity as a diagnostic tool in glaucoma: FACT contrast sensitivity in glaucoma.

Authors:  Sumru Onal; Ozlem Yenice; Sezen Cakir; Ahmet Temel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  The objective assessment of contrast sensitivity function by electrophysiological means.

Authors:  J W Howe; K W Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Contrast sensitivity in diabetic subjects with and without retinopathy.

Authors:  I M Ghafour; W S Foulds; D Allan; E McClure
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Spatial contrast sensitivity revisited.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Spatial and spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of normal and glaucoma eyes.

Authors:  M Korth; F Horn; B Storck; J B Jonas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The rapid assessment of visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  S Della Sala; G Comi; V Martinelli; L Somazzi; A J Wilkins
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Contrast sensitivity in asymmetric glaucoma.

Authors:  M A Motolko; C D Phelps
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing.

Authors:  B L Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Impaired contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with and without retinopathy: a new technique for rapid assessment.

Authors:  S Della Sala; G Bertoni; L Somazzi; F Stubbe; A J Wilkins
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.638

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.