Literature DB >> 7354352

Evoked potentials and contingent negative variation during treatment of multiple sclerosis with spinal cord stimulation.

E M Sedgwick, L S Illis, R C Tallis, A R Thornton, P Abraham, E El-Negamy, T B Docherty, J S Soar, S C Spencer, F M Taylor.   

Abstract

Cervical somatosensory evoked potentials, brainstem evoked potentials, visual evoked potentials, and the cerebral contingent negative variation were recorded in patients with definite multiple sclerosis before, during, and after spinal cord stimulation. Improvements were seen in the cervical somatosensory and brainstem evoked potentials but neither the visual evoked potential nor the contingent negative variation changed in association with spinal cord stimulation. The results indicate that spinal cord stimulation acts at spinal and brainstem levels and that the clinical improvements seen in patients are caused by an action at these levels rather than by any cerebral arousal or motivational effect. The evoked potentials were not useful in predicting which patients were likely to respond to stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7354352      PMCID: PMC490456          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.43.1.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  12 in total

1.  Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat.

Authors:  J S Buchwald; C Huang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Neurological applications of surface-recorded electrocochleography.

Authors:  A R Thornton; C H Hawkes
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  Early evoked potentials.

Authors:  C Shagass
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  The effects of attention and distraction on the contingent negative variation in normal and neurotic subjects.

Authors:  W C McCallum; W G Walter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-10

5.  Properties of a spinal somatosensory evoked potential recorded in man.

Authors:  E el-Negamy; E M Sedgwick
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  The cervical somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D G Small; W B Matthews; M Small
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Short latency potentials recorded from the neck and scalp following median nerve stimulation in man.

Authors:  S J Jones
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-12

8.  Neurophysiological effects of dorsal column stimulation in man and monkey.

Authors:  S J Larson; A Sances; D H Riegel; G A Meyer; D E Dallmann; T Swiontek
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; M Feinmesser
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Dorsal column stimulation. Its effect on the somatosensory evoked response.

Authors:  R D Blair; R G Lee; G Vanderlinden
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1975-12
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  L S Illis; D J Read; E M Sedgwick; R C Tallis
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Dorsal column stimulation in multiple sclerosis: effects on bladder and long term findings.

Authors:  C H Hawkes; R Beard; D Fawcett; E A Paul; D G Thomas
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-09-17

3.  Dorsal column stimulation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  C H Hawkes
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-07-12

4.  Dorsal column stimulation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L S Illis; E M Sedgwick
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-16

5.  Spinal cord stimulation in multiple sclerosis: clinical results.

Authors:  L S Illis; E M Sedgwick; R C Tallis
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 6.  Neuromodulation of lower limb motor control in restorative neurology.

Authors:  Karen Minassian; Ursula Hofstoetter; Keith Tansey; Winfried Mayr
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 7.  Targeting Lumbar Spinal Neural Circuitry by Epidural Stimulation to Restore Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Karen Minassian; W Barry McKay; Heinrich Binder; Ursula S Hofstoetter
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Dorsal root ganglia may be reservoirs of viral infection in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D A Nelson
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.538

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.