Literature DB >> 7354351

Spinal cord stimulation in multiple sclerosis: clinical results.

L S Illis, E M Sedgwick, R C Tallis.   

Abstract

Clinical results of spinal cord stimulation by means of epidural electrodes are reported in 19 patients with multiple sclerosis. On temporary stimulation with percutaneous electrodes, significant improvement in mobility occurred in 27.7% of 18 patients and the same number showed improved sensory function. Only one of 13 patients with severe upper limb ataxia improved. The major response, both in terms of the percentage of patients responding and the extent of the responses seen was in bladder function: 75% of 16 patients with bladder symptoms improved and seven of the 11 patients with severe bladder disturbance (Kurtzke grade 3 or more) improved. Four of these seven patients had before and after cystometry and 3 showed reduced detrusor hyperreflexia. Altogether, 10 patients had a worthwhile clinical response in one or more aspects of the disease and of these, nine have so far gone on to permanent stimulation. Medium-term results (up to two years) show that, with one exception, improvement in bladder function has been maintained as long as stimulation has been continued and at least 50% of improvement in mobility has been maintained. A favourable response depends not upon the fact of stimulation but upon the type of stimulation received. This, along with other evidence, indicates that the response is not caused either by a placebo effect or by the natural fluctuation of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7354351      PMCID: PMC490455          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.43.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  14 in total

1.  PROBLEMS OF EXPERIMENTAL TRIALS OF THERAPY IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: REPORT BY THE PANEL ON THE EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL TRIALS OF THERAPY IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS.

Authors:  G A SCHUMACHER; G BEEBE; R F KIBLER; L T KURLAND; J F KURTZKE; F MCDOWELL; B NAGLER; W A SIBLEY; W W TOURTELLOTTE; T L WILLMON
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1965-03-31       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  On the evaluation of disability in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J F KURTZKE
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Treatment of spasmodic torticollis with dorsal column stimulation.

Authors:  P L Gildenberg
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Effect of electrical stimulation of the thoracic spinal cord on the function of the bladder in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A D Abbate; A W Cook; M Atallah
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Enlargement of spinal cord synapses after repetitive stimulation of a single posterior root.

Authors:  L S Illis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.

Authors:  C N Shealy; J T Mortimer; J B Reswick
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1967 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 7.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The urethral pressure profile.

Authors:  M Brown; J E Wickham
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1969-04

9.  Percutaneous epidural neurostimulation for paraplegic spasticity.

Authors:  R R Richardson; D G McLone
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1978-03

10.  Dorsal-column stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L S Illis; A E Oygar; E M Sedgwick; M A Awadalla
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-06-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of chronic wounds by means of electric and electromagnetic fields. Part 1. Literature review.

Authors:  L Vodovnik; R Karba
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Spinal direct current stimulation modulates the activity of gracile nucleus and primary somatosensory cortex in anaesthetized rats.

Authors:  J Aguilar; F Pulecchi; R Dilena; A Oliviero; A Priori; G Foffani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord: two-dimensional finite element analysis with particular reference to epidural electrodes.

Authors:  B Coburn
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Spinal cord stimulation in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  L S Illis; D J Read; E M Sedgwick; R C Tallis
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Dorsal column stimulation in multiple sclerosis: effects on bladder and long term findings.

Authors:  C H Hawkes; R Beard; D Fawcett; E A Paul; D G Thomas
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-09-17

6.  Spinal cord stimulation in peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  R C Tallis; L S Illis; E M Sedgwick; C Hardwidge; J S Garfield
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Dorsal column stimulation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L S Illis; E M Sedgwick
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-16

8.  Refractory period of single motor nerve fibres in man.

Authors:  J Borg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Evoked potentials and contingent negative variation during treatment of multiple sclerosis with spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  E M Sedgwick; L S Illis; R C Tallis; A R Thornton; P Abraham; E El-Negamy; T B Docherty; J S Soar; S C Spencer; F M Taylor
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  The vasodilating effect of spinal dorsal column stimulation is mediated by sympathetic nerves.

Authors:  H Naver; L E Augustinsson; M Elam
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.