Literature DB >> 7348700

Piezoelectric ceramic implants: in vivo results.

J B Park, B J Kelly, G H Kenner, A F von Recum, M F Grether, W W Coffeen.   

Abstract

The suitability of barium titanate (BaTiO3) ceramic for direct substitution of hard tissues was evaluated using both electrically stimulated (piezoelectric) and inactive (nonpolarized) test implants. Textured cylindrical specimens, half of them made piezoelectric by polarization in a high electric field, were implanted into the cortex of the midshaft region of the femora of dogs for various periods of time. Interfacial healing and bio-compatibility of the implant material were studied using mechanical, microradiographical, and histological techniques. Our results indicate that barium titanate ceramic shows a very high degree of biocompatibility as evidenced by the absence of inflammatory or foreign body reactions at the implant-tissue interface. Furthermore, the material and its surface porosity allowed a high degree of bone ingrowth as evidenced by microradiography and a high degree of interfacial tensile strength. No difference was found between the piezoelectric and the electrically neutral implant-tissue interfaces. Possible reasons for this are discussed. The excellent mechanical properties of barium titanate, its superior biocompatibility, and the ability of bone to form a strong mechanical interfacial bond with it, makes this material a new candidate for further tests for hard tissue replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7348700     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820150114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  8 in total

1.  An in vitro study of electrically active hydroxyapatite-barium titanate ceramics using Saos-2 cells.

Authors:  Frances R Baxter; Irene G Turner; Christopher R Bowen; Jonathan P Gittings; Julian B Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Effect of compliant layers within piezoelectric composites on power generation providing electrical stimulation in low frequency applications.

Authors:  E D Krech; E S Cadel; R M Barrett; E A Friis
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-08-21

3.  Sheets of vertically aligned BaTiO3 nanotubes reduce cell proliferation but not viability of NIH-3T3 cells.

Authors:  Marianna Giannini; Martina Giannaccini; Teresa Sibillano; Cinzia Giannini; Dun Liu; Zhigang Wang; Andrea Baù; Luciana Dente; Alfred Cuschieri; Vittoria Raffa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Nanostructured ultra-thin patches for ultrasound-modulated delivery of anti-restenotic drug.

Authors:  Lorenzo Vannozzi; Leonardo Ricotti; Carlo Filippeschi; Stefania Sartini; Vito Coviello; Vincenzo Piazza; Pasqualantonio Pingue; Concettina La Motta; Paolo Dario; Arianna Menciassi
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-12-23

5.  Multi-Elemental Profiling of Tibial and Maxillary Trabecular Bone in Ovariectomised Rats.

Authors:  Pingping Han; Shifeier Lu; Yinghong Zhou; Karine Moromizato; Zhibin Du; Thor Friis; Yin Xiao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Capacitive Feedthroughs for Medical Implants.

Authors:  Sven Grob; Peter A Tass; Christian Hauptmann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Smart Injectable Self-Setting Monetite Based Bioceramics for Orthopedic Applications.

Authors:  Naresh Koju; Prabaha Sikder; Bipin Gaihre; Sarit B Bhaduri
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  3D Printing of Piezoelectric Barium Titanate-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds with Interconnected Porosity for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Christian Polley; Thomas Distler; Rainer Detsch; Henrik Lund; Armin Springer; Aldo R Boccaccini; Hermann Seitz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.