Literature DB >> 73448

Correlations between psychophysical magnitude estimates and simultaneously obtained auditory nerve, brain stem and cortical responses to click stimuli in man.

H Pratt, H Sohmer.   

Abstract

Responses from the auditory nerve, brain stem auditory nuclei and cortex, as well as subjective responses to click stimuli at 10 intensities, were recorded simultaneously in the same human subjects. For various measures of the responses, the power-law exponents of their intensity functions were calculated, along with their statistical significances. The electrophysiological and psycho-physical functions were compared for similarity. On average, the exponents of the intensity functions of amplitudes of the auditory nerve and earlier brain stem responses were highly significant, showing similarity across subjects and similarity with the exponents of the subjective estimates. However, a closer examination proved this similarity to be superficial, since magnitude estimates showed an appreciable intersubject and intersession variability while the auditory nerve and brain stem responses were approximately constant. All other electric response measures either had exponents which were not significant or showed even poorer correlation with the subjective response. It is proposed that the type of electrical activity recorded in this study may not be the proper set of neural parameters which give rise to the loudness estimate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 73448     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90003-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  Objective estimation of loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Relations among Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Response Measures, Categorical Loudness Judgments, and Their Associated Physical Intensities.

Authors:  Peggy A Korczak; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

4.  Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Benjamin Kirby; Carolyn Brown; Paul Abbas; Christine Etler; Sara O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Power functions of loudness magnitude estimations and auditory brainstem evoked responses.

Authors:  K G Wilson; R M Stelmack
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-06

6.  Neural Representation of Loudness: Cortical Evoked Potentials in an Induced Loudness Reduction Experiment.

Authors:  Florian H Schmidt; Manfred Mauermann; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  The ups and downs of temporal orienting: a review of auditory temporal orienting studies and a model associating the heterogeneous findings on the auditory N1 with opposite effects of attention and prediction.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.