Literature DB >> 7335443

The impossible dream of Fechner and Stevens.

D J Weiss.   

Abstract

The idea that there is a single psychophysical function which describes how the human responds to stimulus intensity is rejected. The form of any empirical function depends upon the buried yet arbitrary assumption about how the stimuli are to be measured. Because psychophysical functions have this arbitrary basis, there can be no universal law, and further, no psychophysical function can reveal a general truth about the nervous system. The power law has been inappropriately reified; the descriptive usefulness of the power function has been incorrectly extended, perhaps because simplicity is appealing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7335443     DOI: 10.1068/p100431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  3 in total

1.  Why unbiased numerical magnitude judgments of the loudness of noise are linear in decibels: a rejoinder to the Teghtsoonians.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-08

2.  Category scales of sweetness are consistent with sweetness-matching data.

Authors:  R L McBride
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-08

3.  On the difficulty to think in ratios: a methodological bias in Stevens' magnitude estimation procedure.

Authors:  Alica Mertens; Ulf K Mertens; Veronika Lerche
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.