Literature DB >> 3763361

Why unbiased numerical magnitude judgments of the loudness of noise are linear in decibels: a rejoinder to the Teghtsoonians.

E C Poulton.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3763361     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Laws of sensory magnitude.

Authors:  M TREISMAN
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The influence of context on constant-sum loudness-judgments.

Authors:  T ENGEN; N LEVY
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-12

3.  Biases in quantitative judgements.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Scaling loudness over short ranges: a reply to Poulton.

Authors:  R Teghtsoonian; M Teghtsoonian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-01

5.  Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens' law.

Authors:  R Teghtsoonian
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1973-03

6.  Range and regression effects in magnitude scaling.

Authors:  R Teghtsoonian; M Teghtsoonian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-10

7.  A linear relation between loudness and decibels.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10

8.  Subjective zeros, subjectively equal stimulus spacing, and contraction biases in very first judgments of lightness.

Authors:  E C Poulton; D C Simmonds
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-05

9.  Comparison of two theories of "ratio" and "difference" judgments.

Authors:  M H Birnbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-09

10.  Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.