Literature DB >> 733195

Leg length discrepancy: how much is too much?

R H Gross.   

Abstract

A survey of 74 skeletally mature patients with leg length discrepancies of 1.5 cm or more revealed that patients with less than a 2.0-cm discrepancy did not consider their short leg to be a problem in any way. As the amount of discrepancy increased, there were more problems, although there was no critical "cutoff" point. Some patients functioned well athletically with discrepancies of over 2.5 cm. A survey of pediatric orthopedists reflected the wide variety of opinion regarding indications for equalization of leg length discrepancy noted in the literature. It is concluded that there seems little indication for equalization of discrepancies less than 2 cm. For larger amounts of discrepancy, "clinical judgment" still must be weighed on an individual basis, as individual variation among patients with leg length discrepancy confounds any precise classification of functional disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 733195     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19780701-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  22 in total

1.  The effect on low back pain of shortening osteotomy for leg length inequality.

Authors:  I Rossvoll; S Junk; T Terjesen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Sports injuries in children and adolescents.

Authors:  L J Micheli; J D Klein
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Effect of a textured insole on balance and gait symmetry.

Authors:  Alexander S Aruin; Neeta Kanekar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of simulating leg length inequality on spinal posture and pelvic position: a dynamic rasterstereographic analysis.

Authors:  Marcel Betsch; Michael Wild; Birgit Große; Walter Rapp; Thomas Horstmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Dynamic leg length asymmetry during gait is not a valid method for estimating mild anatomic leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  Gustavo Leporace; Luiz Alberto Batista; Raphael Serra Cruz; Gabriel Zeitoune; Gabriel Armondi Cavalin; Leonardo Metsavaht
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-17

6.  Can residual leg shortening be predicted in patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes' disease?

Authors:  Kwang-Won Park; Kyu-Seon Jang; Hae-Ryong Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Current concepts of leg lengthening.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler; Andreas H Krieg
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Percutaneous Epiphysiodesis Using Transphyseal Screws: a Case Series Demonstrating High Efficacy.

Authors:  Emily R Dodwell; Matthew R Garner; Elise Bixby; Eva M Luderowski; Daniel W Green; John S Blanco; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-04-03

9.  Leg length discrepancy and osteoarthritis in the knee, hip and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kelvin J Murray; Michael F Azari
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-09

Review 10.  The Actions of IGF-1 in the Growth Plate and Its Role in Postnatal Bone Elongation.

Authors:  Holly L Racine; Maria A Serrat
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.