Literature DB >> 7331807

Deformation and loosening of the tibial component in knee arthroplasty with unicompartmental endoprostheses.

K Knutson, G Jónsson, J Langer Andersen, H Lárusdóttir, L Lidgren.   

Abstract

Roentgenological signs of deformation and loosening of the tibial component in knee arthroplasties with unicompartmental endoprostheses occurred in one-third of 87 rheumatoid (RA) knees within 2 years and in one-fifth of 107 osteoarthritic (OA) knees within 3 years after the operation. Compared with thicker components significantly more 6 mm components in RA, and 6 and 9 mm components in OA became deformed and loose. There was no difference in the clinical assessment of the knees with and without deformed tibial components. Reoperations were recorded during an extended follow-up. In the group with initially asymptomatic loosening twelve RA knees within four and a half years and three OA knees within four years developed pain on weight-bearing and had to be reoperated. One patient (OA) had loose components without any roentgenological signs; the loosening was first discovered when the unoperated compartment was revised because of secondary osteoarthrosis. Knees fitted with 6 mm components more often required reoperation because of loosening than did those with thicker components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7331807     DOI: 10.3109/17453678108992165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  9 in total

Review 1.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The influence of metal backing in unicompartmental tibial component fixation. An in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of micromotion.

Authors:  L Ryd; A Lindstrand; A Stenström; G Selvik
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Simone Bignozzi; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical results of unicompartmental arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis using a tibial component with screw fixation.

Authors:  Tomihisa Koshino; Koji Sato; Yusuke Umemoto; Yasushi Akamatsu; Ken Kumagai; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Unicompartmental knee replacement in osteoarthritis: an 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  O Johnell; I Sernbo; C F Gentz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1985

6.  Tibial plateau strength patterns in experimental modular knee replacement.

Authors:  I Hvid; J T Møller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1985

7.  Mid-term results of oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Won-Sik Choy; Kap Jung Kim; Sang Ki Lee; Dae Suk Yang; Neung Ki Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-08-19

8.  Long-term results of Marmor arthroplasty in varus osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  H Kofoed; C Asmussen; H Lindewald
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a review.

Authors:  O Robertsson; J Ranstam; M Sundberg; A W-Dahl; L Lidgren
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.