Literature DB >> 25341949

Clinical results of unicompartmental arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis using a tibial component with screw fixation.

Tomihisa Koshino1, Koji Sato, Yusuke Umemoto, Yasushi Akamatsu, Ken Kumagai, Tomoyuki Saito.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Unicompartmental knee prostheses with screw fixation into the proximal tibia were employed and postoperative clinical results for osteoarthritis of the knee, especially regarding relief of pain, range of motion and satisfactory limb alignment are reported and discussed.
METHODS: A total of 140 knees (131 medial and 9 lateral) of 85 patients (21 men and 64 women) were followed up for two to 17 years with an average of 7.0 ± 3.0 years.
RESULTS: In spite of loss to follow-up in three knees of two patients and revision to total knee arthroplasty in one knee of one patient, in the remaining 136 knees (82 patients) the mean knee score of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System was 41.0 ± 14.7 pre-operatively, which improved to 93.1 ± 5.7 at follow-up, while the mean functional score similarly improved from 36.9 ± 8.1 to 88.5 ± 6.3 (p < 0.001 respectively). One knee developed a fracture in the medial proximal part of the tibia, but no knee developed loosening of the prosthesis or infection. The mean pre-operative knee flexion was 122.6 ± 15.9°, which improved to 132.9 ± 13.4° (p < 0.001) at follow-up. The limb alignment showed 4.8 ± 4.5° anatomical varus angulation pre-operatively, which was corrected to 5.8 ± 3.3° valgus at follow-up in the medial unicompartmental replacement group (127 knees), and 19 ± 6.1° valgus pre-operatively, which was corrected to 6.7 ± 3.0° valgus at follow-up in the lateral unicompartmental replacement group (nine knees).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of arthroplasty with screw fixation were concluded to be promising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25341949     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2564-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Analysis of first forty Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement from a small district hospital in UK.

Authors:  Graham W Keys; Zain Ul-Abiddin; Eugene M Toh
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!

Authors:  K L Luscombe; J Lim; P W Jones; S H White
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis: 5 to 9 years follow-up evaluation of 77 knees.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; Y Ooishi; T Shimizu; H Sugiura; S Takahashi; H Ito; H Iwata
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Unicompartmental replacement with the Marmor Modular knee: operative procedure and results.

Authors:  T Koshino; T Morii; J Wada; S Takahashi
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst       Date:  1991

5.  Common causes of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy one cases.

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Kathrin Dersch; Atul F Kamath; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

7.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  R S Laskin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Polyethylene wear of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement at 20 years.

Authors:  B J L Kendrick; D J Simpson; B L Kaptein; E R Valstar; H S Gill; D W Murray; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-04

10.  Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure.

Authors:  Lukas A Lisowski; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Peter Pilot; C Niek van Dijk; Andrzej E Lisowski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  3 in total

1.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective: ten year results.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Chiara Del Regno; Carlo Perisano; Antonio D'Amelio; Katia Corona; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Update on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications and failure modes.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Alexander Antoniadis; Naeder Helmy
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 3.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Modes of Failure and Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Katia Corona; Rocco D'Apolito; Giuseppe Mazzitelli; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-06-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.