Literature DB >> 7329750

The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques.

R P O'Shea, B Crassini.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry was induced between two orthogonal square-wave gratings of the same spatial frequency, luminance, contrast, and field size, presented dichoptically. One of the gratings could be instantly replaced by a third grating differing only in orientation. In one experiment subjects were required to respond as soon as an orientation change was noticed, and to withhold response to catch trials (no orientation change). When orientation changes were made to the visible grating, reaction time was found to be a U-shaped function of the magnitude of orientation change. When orientation changes were made to the grating undergoing binocular-rivalry suppression, an overall increase in reaction time was found with the increase being greater for large orientation changes (an asymmetrical U-shaped function). In another experiment subjects were required to detect the direction of a change in orientation in a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. Thresholds were thus obtained for 75% correct performance. It was found that thresholds for orientation changes made to the visible and invisible fields were identical from 20 degrees to 70 degrees orientation change. Outside this range thresholds were higher when orientation changes were made to the field suppressed by binocular rivalry. It is argued that the orientation functions obtained in the two experiments may represent incomplete suppression of either form or transient information during binocular rivalry.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7329750     DOI: 10.1068/p100283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  7 in total

1.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  How Much of the "Unconscious" is Just Pre - Threshold?

Authors:  Manfred W Fahle; Torsten Stemmler; Karoline M Spang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Advantage of hole stimulus in rivalry competition.

Authors:  Qianli Meng; Ding Cui; Ke Zhou; Lin Chen; Yuanye Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield.

Authors:  Surya Gayet; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Chris L E Paffen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-23

6.  Do early neural correlates of visual consciousness show the oblique effect? A binocular rivalry and event-related potential study.

Authors:  Bradley N Jack; Urte Roeber; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Temporal analysis of image-rivalry suppression.

Authors:  Rishi Bhardwaj; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.